Talk:London Basin
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WP London
[edit]Just a little niggle: Why have London Basin as low importance (for WP London) if London Clay is mid importance? London Clay is just a component of the London Basin (and other areas), while if it were not for the basin, London would be a very different place. The basin has fed and housed Londoners, provided water, trade and transport routes, etc for its huge population. Not that I'm biased or anything. Pterre (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
ISBN
[edit]Can anyone provide a correct ISBN for "Chilterns: Sheet 51N 02W Solid Geology"? My copy has no ISBN (not done at this point) and script seems to have rejected what I thought was correct. Not given in NERC catalogue. BGS are seemingly all digital now. Pterre (talk) 14:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)