Talk:London-class battleship/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 02:47, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Every image was necessarily taken before 1923, so that's easy.

Infobox

Everything consistent with prose.

Lead

London-class ships began to be transferred to - both active and passive voice, reword
- Done
but they were withdrawn in May to reinforce the Italian fleet blockading the Austro-Hungarian Navy in the Adriatic Sea. - link Otranto Barrage and specify that the blockade was successful only in blockading surface ships, U-boats could pass through easily
- Done

Construction

Change section title to "Ships" or something like that
- I prefer the current heading, since it's a summary of the construction of the ships, and it's an easy link in the ToC for a reader who might want to know when the ships were built.

Really impressive article - I've had a hard time finding anything to suggest. L293D (☎ • ✎) 17:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.