Talk:Logos Foundation (Australia)

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Logos Foundation (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

A note about the "Demise and Dissolution" section - while the respective theologies of Toowoomba City Church and the Assembly of God Churches (Aus.) are similar, there do exist notable differences, particularly in eschatology, and (outside of localised pastoral fraternal activities) no official governing/oversight relationship exists between TCC and AOG. Toowoomba City Church is independent and is affiliated with an independent church-style conglomerate (for want of a better word) for credentialing not oversight (as are many independent Charismatic/Pentecostal churches). Thus the implication of significant connection between AOG and TCC is not an accurate reflection of the situation.

I haven't edited the page directly as I was hoping that the above information might prove helpful to the article's originator in making the 'Demise' section more encyclopaedic.

You are encouraged to edit the page directly. This page needs to be referenced as well, if anyone can find good online articles on Logos, please post links here or reference the article if you know how.

Also, I would like to see some more information on the inner workings of the church, philosophies etc. Also scatterseed information and other recruiting practices.

This article needs a clean up and needs referencing most of all. It does not conform to the manual of style in it's current incarnation. aliasd·U·T 06:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a possible candidate for deletion

Continuing from 2007 points above and considering the article is headed by :

This is an essay.

It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

It was written primarily by two (or is it one) single purpose Qld IP editors 1.128.111.103 and 1.132.96.185. Most of the article contains unsupported statements with the single major citation being: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:8027/HARRISON_eprint_.pdf - 972ajk (talk)

The article certainly needs improvement, but as well as the four sources currently in the article, there are more in digitised newspapers, in books, etc. The subject does appear to be notable, and deletion would not be uncontroversial. I have tidied up the existing references, and will attempt to improve the article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been subject to contributions from a number of editors, in excess of the two or three that have dominated recent edits. Deletion should not occur as it would indeed be controversial and it is clearly a notable subject in regard to Queensland's history, religion, public figures and the city of Toowoomba. Additional references should be able to be found and included to further improve this article. 1.128.104.111 (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Article seems to be in relatively good shape. I removed the maintenance tags. Nowa (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the bulk of this article

This article and its content has existed for many years uncited, it has been tagged as such since 2017, and nobody has come forward to fix it. As per Wikipedia:Verifiability/Removal of Unsourced Material, we have surely waited "long enough". The content is of course available through the article history if you can find citations to support the restoration of any of its content, but please do not restore any content without adequate citations. We are here to build an encyclopedia. Kerry (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]