Talk:Logjam (computer security)

Computer Security: Computing High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing: Networking / Software / Security Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

wrongfull assumption...

it's already possible to use this type of attack on 1024-bits..

Why ? Well you don't need ALL the answer of the precompute in order to get access to some degree..

If you have like 0.1% of all the answers required technically you have 0.1% access to all possible targets of this attack..

Juts an FYI..

(If the number of targets number in the miilions, 0.1% precompute yields round about 1.000 breaches of security..) But that's just me thinking here, if this is not true, well.. :D (mouth full of teeth smiling innocently..)

Laterz,

ZMacZ Furreh.. 62.238.45.66 (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Group

The "Details" section says "group" but it seems all the "groups" are cyclic groups. A cyclic group is determined by its order. That, if true, explains what seems to be free use of "group" and "number" as equivalents. Without that, the use of "group" is confusing. This should be corrected, but I don't know enough to say that "group" should be "cyclic group". Is that true? 23:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC) Zaslav (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]