Talk:Logistics/Archives/2017
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Logistics. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Section Starting With " ENHANCING LOGISTICS CAPABILITY INTRODUCTION"
I admit that I am no expert on this subject, but it seems to me that there is no good reason to keep the section which begins with "ENHANCING LOGISTICS CAPABILITY INTRODUCTION". There are no internal links, and it seems to me that it beyond the scope of an wikipedia article. I would like your thoughts about this. Please feel free to reply below. Thank you. 159.83.54.2 (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like it was some sort of spam for an essay ghost-writer? Don't know exactly, but it doesn't belong regardless. I've removed it. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Logistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160522172303/http://cscmp.org/sites/default/files/user_uploads/resources/downloads/glossary-2013.pdf to http://cscmp.org/sites/default/files/user_uploads/resources/downloads/glossary-2013.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)