Jump to content

Talk:Lodewijk van den Berg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLodewijk van den Berg has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 18, 2022.

Dutch Wikipedia article

[edit]

I see no reason why one couldn't reference the Dutch Wikipedia article on Lodewijk van den Berg with information. Maybe someone who reads Dutch could look over the article at http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodewijk_van_den_Berg to add to this English article.
User:Brenont 13:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Dutch nationality

[edit]

I started looking into Lodewijk a bit more. He is kind of the "forgotten astronaut" of the Netherlands. Really weird actually. I found some material, will add it into the article at a later time. It's too late now for me :D --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 23:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Fragment on Dutch TV about Lodewijk van den Berg. link to tv archive page[reply]

Also referenced in TU Delft Integraal, 2005, number 3 link to pdf

News article

[edit]

A recent news article that mentions him: http://www.pzc.nl/regio/zeeland/4093700/Ruimtereis-is-als-geboorte-van-een-kind.ece --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 19:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good article

[edit]

I'm nominating this for good article review. I feel I have done as much as I can do. More information on the subject does not seem to be available (private person?). There are some research papers that he worked on, but they are not really useful for a bio. It possibly requires a bit more copy editing? --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 15:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lodewijk van den Berg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]