Talk:Lockheed L-133

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

No photographs, diagrams or even proof this design ever existed.

That's it in a nutshell. The links at the bottom are gone, and there is no real evidence that any of this ever happened. Can we improve this article by including some citations and references, and maybe at least a drawing? I'm interested in learning more about this advanced plane the US military declined to fund. 73.6.96.168 (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drawings and images are usually restricted by copyrights, and so its difficult to find copyright-free images for unbuilt projects. While the external links are dead, their are still two dead-tree books in the bibliography, and those are sufficient sources per Wikipedia's Reliable Sources policies. There are other books that cover the aircraft also. BilCat (talk) 19:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Language reads auto-generated

Especially the swept-wing section, who writes like this? 2A02:8109:B709:D900:FDFB:987C:21F5:12E8 (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit added the scrambled text, it should have been noted earlier. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]