Jump to content

Talk:Lockheed Corporation/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Questions

If you're going to put up pictures, how about one of the L1049 Connie? She's at least as important as the Blackbird. --squadfifteen

This company was mentioned in bowling for columine, wasn't it?

Columbine was in 1999, so I suspect any reference would be to Lockheed Martin, not plain 'ol Lockheed. Willy Logan 17:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

People! There is a call for discussion open on this page, and absolutely no discussion going on! I, for one, agree that the two articles should be merged. Anyone else? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? chizotz 07:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Agree with merge -vlcmkd

Agree with merge Ecozeppelin 15:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Electra/Orion

Odd that there's no section on the Lockheed L-188 Electra, a turboprop airliner introduced in 1958 that was initially plagued with a design flaw leading to several highly publicized crashes before it was fixed. A military version, the Lockheed P-3 Orion, remains in service and was used by the Australian Air Force in the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 in 2014. Sca (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

F-35 missing on the fighters list

Shouldn't it be there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.32.55.200 (talk) 22:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

No, it should not be there. The F-35 is a Lockheed Martin product, produced long after the merger of 1995. It's come back several times since this post, but I've removed it again. - BilCat (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Water pollution in the United States

The article was added to this category, but the article seems to be missing some information about Lockheed Corporation's environmental record. Jarble (talk) 03:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lockheed Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Too much consideration of politics and scandals

This is yet another POS Wikipedia article by some oaf with an axe to grind. Most of the article deals with the financial problems and resultant scandals of the company. Not near enough space is devoted to what it did, build some of the world's greatest aircraft. Why is it we cannot achieve balance here? I believe Kelly Johnson is mentioned once. Not near enough. Indeed, if one deletes every sentence that does not relate to an aircraft (the company's raison d'être, duh), the article would shrink to 10 seconds of mumbling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvinLuse (talk • contribs) 17:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Bribery scandals, crisis in the Dutch monarchy I need to see to, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Bernhard_of_Lippe-Biesterfeld, that's not covered by the word political, they are royal , the Dutch crown was endangered, but save by a non fair deal, not reveling the true story to the majesty, or the investigation commission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.80.157.6 (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lockheed Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockheed Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

POS

Did Lackheed manufacture Point of Sale equipment at one point? At my post office, they have a Lockheed Martin cash register/POS. Any comments?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lockheed_Corporation/Archive_1&oldid=1152059917"