Talk:Local blood flow regulation

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 December 2019 and 15 January 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AEWieneke. Peer reviewers: Joewalbridge.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The readability of the article is 41.7. The website I used to evaluate this said that the article should be easily understood by 15 to 16 year olds. That met the goal of being appropriate for high school level. • I think they did a good job of adhering to the topic and also not getting off of track. I think the topic of “local blood flow regulation” is rather complication but they did a good job of staying focused and making it easy to read. • There were no images or figures used. I do not think there would have been a lot of good pictures/figures available to use for this topic. • They appeared to properly use citations. Citations are not one of my strengths, so it is a little hard to tell. • Most of the sources seemed reliable. There were a couple that seemed not as reliable as I would have liked. For example, the Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts, seemed like a not super reliable website. • Overall, I think they did a good job. It was a very complicated topic and they made it relatively easy to understand. It would have been nice to try to use some sort of image or figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medstudent10 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]