Talk:Local Journalism Sustainability Act
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]@Athaenara and Forbes72: User:Athaenara can you please explain why you reverted the 2022-05-22T10:02:44 addition by User:Forbes72 1:24:39 h:mm:ss later?
It seems to me it's entirely relevant, especially since it has been reintroduced in the new session of Congress in both the House and the Senate. Accordlingly, I've revised that "Discussion" section of the article, so the previous sentence and those additions flow more smoothly. I hope this meets with you approval. DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- David, it looks like I wasn't reverted. Athaenara's edit reverted the edit by User:Mikeblinder, while leaving my additions intact. I agree with the revert, because this this looks like WP:COI editing. Editor & Publisher looks reasonable enough as a source for WP:RSOPINION regarding newspaper publishing, but https://dankennedy.net/ is not a good source, since it is a self-published blog. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 16:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles