Jump to content

Talk:Loca (Shakira song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DivaKnockouts (talk · contribs) 07:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • Copy-edited parts of the lead.
  • "Upon its release, "Loca" received generally favorable reviews from music critics, who complimented the inclusion of merengue music in the track." → Upon its release, "Loca" received generally favorable reviews from music critics, who complimented the inclusion of merengue music on the track.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "It features Shakira interacting with the beach crowd." → "It features Shakira interacting with a beach crowd."

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stay consistent with which version of English you use. (i.e, "favorable" and "favourable")

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "About the collaboration Dizzee Rascal said that "I know it sounds a bit mad now, but you'll see it and see what's going on", he said." → "Speaking about the collaboration, Dizzee Rascal said that "I know it sounds a bit mad now, but you'll see it and see what's going on", he said."

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Lyrically, the song is about Shakira expressing her erratic and obsessive behaviour towards her lover, more so than his other leading lady,[2] prominently heard in the lines "She'd die for your love / But your love's only mine, boy" and "I'm crazy but you like it"." — Move the reference in this sentence to the end.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception
  • Again, stay consistent with what English you use. (i.e., "favorable" and "complement".)

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Who is Pitbull? (I know who he is, but provide information for the uninvolved reader. "American rapper" should do.)

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance
  • "On the week of September 18, 2010 the song debuted at number 40 on the Billboard Tropical Songs..." — Add a comma after September 18, 2010.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling this to me. I'll take care next time I edit song articles :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "and number 1 on digital tropical charts with great selling of 6000+ downloads." — "great selling" sounds a little to much on the WP:FANCRUFT side. Perhaps, "strong digital sells" would do better?

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "On the week of September 25, 2010 the song debuted at number 31 on the Billboard Latin Songs and reached its peak position at number 1." — Add a comma after September 25, 2010. Also, added when it reached its peak position. "1" needs to be written out per WP:ORDINAL.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Billboard link was dead here and I couldn't find any archive. I had to remove all the date information as a result since Allmusic doesn't specify it. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "On the week of October 14, 2010 "Loca" debuted at number 98 on Billboard Hot 100." — Add a comma after October 14, 2010.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The song has become Shakira's ninth number-one hit on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs and her thirteenth number 1 hit on the Latin Pop Songs, making her the second female artist with most number-one hits after Gloria Estefan (14) on the former and the female artist with most on the latter." — All numbers under ten must be written out per WP:ORDINAL.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why is the information about "Loca"'s debut, peak and sales separated?

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "On the week of September 27, 2010 the song debuted at number 10 in Spain and at number 25 in Italy." — Add a comma after September 27, 2010.

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music video
  • The music video was released on September 29, 2010 and the Spanish version of the video was released as the free video of the week on iTunes on December 21, 2010. — Which version was released on September 29, 2010? Also, where is the source(s) to confirm this?

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Shakira performed the song with Dizzee Rascal for the first time on the MTV EMA 2010 on November 7, 2010." — How could Shakira have performed the song with Dizzee Rascal for the first time on the MTV EMA 2010 on November 7, 2010 if above you state she performed it first on September 23, 2010? Also, EMA should be spelled out.
Actually what the sentence meant was that they performed the song together for the first time. So I tweaked it.  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
References-

 Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • FN#2 — No italics to AOL Radio, not a printed source, per WP:CITEHOW.
  • FN#4 — Date missing. (December 2, 2010)
  • FN#5 — No italics to iTunes Store per WP:CITEHOW.
  • FN#6 — See FN#6.
  • FN#8 — Date missing. (September 7, 2010)
  • FN#9 — Date missing. (October 29, 2010)
  • FN#10 — Date missing. (October 25, 2010)
  • FN#12 — Date missing. (October 19, 2010), Author missing. (Stewart, Allison), Typo: "SOl".
  • FN#13 — Date missing. (May 20, 2010)
  • FN#17 — No italics to About.com per WP:CITEHOW.
  • FN#20 — No italics to Allmusic per WP:CITEHOW. Also, Rovi Corporation now publishes Allmusic, not All Media Guide.
  • FN#21 — Link is dead.
  • FN#24 — See FN#20.
  • FN#31 — No italics to MTV News per above.
  • FN#32 — See FN#31.
  • FN#34 — See FN#31.
  • FN#41 — Terra Networks should be the work parameter while Telefónica should be the publisher.
  • FN#45 — Not a reliable source.
  • FN#51 — No italics to iTunes Store per above.
  • FN#52–53 — See FN#51.
  • FN#55 — See FN#51.
  • FN#60 — Not a reliable source per WP:CHARTS.
  • FN#61–63 — Language parameters needed.
  • FN#65 — This source is in Spanish, should be noted.
  • FN#67-69 — Language parameters needed.
  • FN#96–104 — No italics to iTunes Store per above.
  • Stay consistent with what date format you use. (i.e, 9 June 2013 or June 9, 2013)
Actually a bot went about and removed all the italics Wikiredactor had put to reverse the auto-italicization of the non publisher work parameters. Ugh, gotta do it again. Hope the bot doesn't show up again :O --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I'm almost done. But I have a problem with the unreliable sources since the ref order has changed. Can you please copy paste the entire foot note text for me? I'm really sorry for increasing your work. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If I remember correctly, it was Perez Hilton's blog. — DivaKnockouts 12:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Putting article  On hold until issues have been addressed or resolved. Wow, that was a lot! xD Should of let Erick get this one. Hahaha, jk. — DivaKnockouts 07:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Actually this was the first song article I have worked on. Thanks for conducting this review, you have pointed out so many new things to take care of next time. Thank you so much! :D --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All  Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Great job on the article. Now passing :) — DivaKnockouts 13:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you soooooo sooooooooooooooo much! My first GA article! :'D — Preceding unsigned comment added by WonderBoy1998 (talkcontribs) 13:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]