Jump to content

Talk:Loaded (band)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: demize (t · c) 00:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Initial impressions

[edit]

Well sourced, well laid out and formatted, images are all good. demize (t · c) 00:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference layout

[edit]

I noticed some minor errors in the reference layout (reference order with multiple references, references after punctuation). Once I get windows re-installed on my windows laptop, I'll do a quick run through with AWB to correct this and any other of AWB's general fixes. demize (t · c) 02:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great page!Very well written. One note is that there is a former bandmate that needs to be added. Former Bandmates needs to include Mark Fain guitar (2000) Wonderlust17 (talk) 15:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Wonderlust17 <ref>http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/releases/duff/loaded/<ref> <ref>http://www.knowledgewiki.org/article/Loaded_%28band%29?enk=RsGGyQaZZokmGUaxZLlkoSbJBplkiWaZB6nGicbJphkG#Band_members<ref>[reply]

Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Very good article, in my opinion. Good job.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    One sentence is out of place: ("Previously, the Loaded members worked on material by sending mp3 files to each other.") but other than that it's good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    The section on the current and past members could use some references, but it is supported by previous references.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Very good job keeping it neutral.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Good job! demize (t · c) 03:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]