Talk:Llandow air disaster

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Regarding the departure airport - Belfast or Dublin. I'm checking this authoritatively and will come back on this. Because the game was in Belfast I have always assumed that they flew direct. Most people didn't realise that the game was actually in Belfast, they always assume that the game was in Dublin since that's where the current games are played. Liassic (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a strange one. I totally agree that the game was in Belfast, it just appears that the flight took off from Dublin. All the linked web sites, plus two books I have on the subject state the flight was from Dublin. This includes a rugby book which mentions the Belfast match too. Look forward to your investigations. Thanks.--FruitMonkey (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UK National Archive document BT 219/4 (the flight plan) confirms that the aircraft took off from Dublin! Liassic (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Liassic, great detailed work on this.FruitMonkey (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operator name

The name of the operator of the flight was not Airflight, but Fairflight, so I've changed the article. For proof, please see this photo of passengers boarding the doomed flight where the start of the word 'Fairflight' is visible by the passenger door, and read the 16 March 1950 article from Flight Magzine, dated just four days after the crash, where Fairflight is also used. Lastly, the Aviation Safety network also uses Fairflight in their crash description for this accident. --Itsfullofstars (talk) 03:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I changed it back before I saw this note, Airflight and Fairflight were both owned by Doug Bennett and at the time of the accident it was actually owned by the Airflight bit. I have changed it to show Airflight operating as Fairflight to be more accurate. MilborneOne (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quote from Flight International

I have quoted the source, the FI article, rather than the Ministry document. I can quote directly, using "c.g." for centre of gravity, but the required form, as in MOS:QUOTE, is to insert clarifying material within single brackets. I will restore these shortly, to comply with WP practice. The best solution would be to find a source giving the direct text. I couldn't find one, but can any other editor?--Old Moonraker (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does it need a quote as long as the statement is accurate and reflects the source it doesnt need to be an exact copy. MilborneOne (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An acceptable alternative, agreed, but than it has to be incorporated in the text and not written in the <blockquote> format.--Old Moonraker (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

True no need for the blockquote. MilborneOne (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll give it a try later, to allow time for further suggestions.--Old Moonraker (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objections: done.--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Llandow air disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121224112042/http://www.southwalespolicemuseum.org.uk/cy/content/cms/visit_the_archives/the_llandow_air_disa/the_llandow_air_disa.aspx to http://www.southwalespolicemuseum.org.uk/cy/content/cms/visit_the_archives/the_llandow_air_disa/the_llandow_air_disa.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]