Talk:Lizzie Velásquez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Michael! (talk · contribs) 22:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is too short, too narrow, contains little information and should be elaborately worked out. From the article itself, it isn't even clear to me why it is justified that this topic/person should have an article of her own. Please improve and increase the article significantly before you nominate it for a GA again. Right now, this article fails to meet most of the GA criteria. Michael! (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has to be completely and fundamentally rewritten. There are not just a few issues which could be solved in a week. Therefore I didn't put it "on hold", but directly changed it to "FailedGA" status. Michael! (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]