Jump to content

Talk:Liza Soberano/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Promotional fluff

In these two edits I removed what I consider to be promotional fluff. The first bit was a sentence fragment that started out in Dec 2014 as "With Forevermore's success, Soberano is now dubbed as the newest Primetime Princess." Grammar issues aside, this is not an appropriate statement to present as a fact and it certainly wouldn't belong in the lead. If she won People Magazine's "Primetime Princess" award, that might be a different story, but we would present that in the context of awards she's won, not as statements of fact. Same deal with the second statement, "Soberano is recognized as The Leading Lady to Watch For". While sources may have said this, it is not a fact, it's an opinion, and serves to promote the individual. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Similar to the content I removed above, in this edit I removed content about the subject being "launched as one of the 12 new discoveries of ABS-CBN's Star Magic Circle 2013". Grammatically, it's unclear what we're saying here. She graduated from some kind of acting class? She won some kind of award? It sounds promotional, a la the "Soberano is recognized as The Leading Lady to Watch For" comment previously removed. Similar content was found further down in the article. This content was clearly copy/pasted from the reference that supported it, so that's no good, and it also seems to try to elevate the subject by listing her among other potentially well-known people. This isn't an article about them, it's an article about her. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Non-noteworthy awards

Everybody and their mother gives out awards. That doesn't mean we include them automatically at Wikipedia. See WP:V, which says that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. If the awards I removed in these edits are notable, then there should presumably be articles on the awards that have withstood the scrutiny of the community. We're not here to fluff up the article's subject with nonsensical awards, so diligence is required. There were also serious concerns about rowspans that were inexplicably removed by Apettyfer. Please see WP:DTT. Tables need to be accessible to visually impaired users who employ screen readers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Gratuitous removal of properly sourced religion

SS1902: Why did you remove Liza's religion from the article even though it's properly sourced? You do realize that a subject's religious views (or lack thereof) may be put in the article as long as it's neither WP:SYNTH nor unsourced? Please explain yourself. Matieszyn talk 02:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

is it necessary to put that on her article? and why? SS1902 (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
SS1902: Of course it is, simply because it pertains to her "personal life" (i.e religion). I would just simply put it in the infobox since, well, you're right that's it's irrelevant at this level. But per Template:Infobox person, there's a consensus that a subject's religion (or lack thereof) should be emphasized in the article instead of simply leaving it there in the infobox, except in the case of missionaries, religious figures etc. (Liza's not a nun, is she?) Furthermore, there's nothing in WP:BLP that prohibits such content in the article, as long as it's backed by WP:RS and the subject in question has acknowledged practicing her faith. Matieszyn talk 04:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liza Soberano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Grandparents

In the article, it says she was raised by her maternal grandparents. However, every source I’ve seen, including a tweet by her, has said that she was raised by her paternal grandparents. They were Filipino and this is something she cited as influencing her pinoy identity when people criticized her for not being Filipino enough. I’m not a Wikipedia user so idk how this works, but can someone correct this? 2601:983:827F:5260:C66:6411:93AC:F375 (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Liza_Soberano/Archive_1&oldid=1254176195"