Jump to content

Talk:Liverpool John Lennon Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture

[edit]

Terminal possibley either in or out. DannyM 21:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Think about using one of these. Used it in my de:Liverpool John Lennon Airport article. -- Gerolsteiner91 08:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Photo request template removed, as it now has several photos -- Boing! said Zebedee 16:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Liverpool Airport logo.gif

[edit]

Image:Liverpool Airport logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


new ryanair routes

[edit]

updated ryanair destinations following route announcement on 25th july 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:Liverpool Airport logo.svg

[edit]

Image:Liverpool Airport logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

[edit]

They renovated half the place recently, so I suspect the destinations/statistics are pretty much out of date. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 10:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Information about the new terminal building and internal renovations since are included in the 'History' section. The 'Airlines and Destinations' list is constantly updated, as are such lists on all airport related articles. If you were however referring to the '20 Busiest Current Routes out of Liverpool John Lennon Airport' table that is dated 2009, the UK Civil Aviation Authority is yet to release 2010 anual data. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 18:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was mostly concerned about "Airlines and Destinations", because recently having travelled through at least a couple of destination are not "Seasonal", but year-round. Other are minor issues, for example, "The developments currently taking place at Liverpool Airport will see improvements in retail by creating additional shop units and a more advanced security area aiming at reducing waiting times. The new facilities are due to be completed in autumn 2010." -- both the security area and internal shop area is now finished. But I don't want to OR and change material without sources. Anyway, thanks for looking. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LIVERPOOL AIRPORT

[edit]

Bristol Britannia G-ANCF which is preserved outside the Old Terminal Building at Speke is owned by The Britannia Aircraft Preservation Trust ( BAPT )and has nothing to do with The Jetstream Club ( now renamed Speke Airport Historical Group ). Details of the aircraft and the BAPT can be found on our website www.Bristol-Britannia.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.1.97.2 (talk) 10:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shifted here from WP:HELPDESK. -Thibbs (talk) 13:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/liverpool-john/
    Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool John Lennon Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Wayne naming inspiration?

[edit]

I can find no reference to the naming of John Wayne Airport inspiring the renaming of Liverpool Airport. I am minded to remove this un-referenced fact. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 13:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No response after a week so I am removing it. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool John Lennon Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool John Lennon Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag Icons

[edit]

I notice someone added some flag icons to the list of most popular destinations. Is there a case for doing this on the main list of destinations (Airlines and destinations)? It would make that section of the page more useful. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 11:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We dont normally use flags for decoration and they have been removed from the popular destinations section. MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will leave it. I just thought it would make the page more useful for people then just having a list of placenames. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 13:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Charles (talk) continues to disrupt several airport pages by removing future route announcements, even though they are properly referenced. He claims it is spam/promotion when in fact it is standard practice across all airport pages. The fact that Charles chooses only to apply his misguided policy across a small number of airport pages (including this one) shows he is clearly prejudiced. I am therefore reinstating the future routes. I invite discussion on the matter. Bonner16 (talk) 12:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Referenced future routes are normally included if they have a start date. Anything different should really be discussed at project level. MilborneOne (talk) 17:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MilborneOne (talk) for your feedback. In this particular instance the routes all have start dates and are fully bookable in the airline booking engines. Therefore I don't see what the problem is. Bonner16 (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFF. The other articles including unencyclopedic content, contrary to WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL, does not make it right. I will clean up more of them when time permits. I am improving the articles, not "disrupting" them. Please assume good faith.Charles (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Charles (talk) Where exactly in those guidelines does it state that Airport Pages cannot include future destinations if properly sourced? If airport pages have consistently stated future destinations over many years who is to say that you are suddenly in the right now? Bonner16 (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those policies, which must be followed, set out the ethos of Wikipedia. They are not full lists of banned things. There is absolutely no requirement for me to do the same to every similar page. I am not a bot.Charles (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Charles (talk) I will happily concede if there is an official decision on the matter and the policy is applied consistently across all airport pages. You can't just pick and choose which pages you delete future destinations from. Consistency is key. Bonner16 (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So Charles (talk) you claim to have improved this page when all you have succeeded in doing is making it inconsistent with every other airport page on Wikipedia. Inconsistent with point 11 of the Airlines and Destinations content of the WT:AIRPORTS guidelines which allows for future destinations and which every other airport page adheres to. I therefore intend to edit the Liverpool Airport page to be consistent with the rest of the airport pages. Bonner16 (talk) 21:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New logo/rebrand

[edit]

It has been 2 months since the rebrand of LJLA, someone needs to get the updated logo on the Wikipedia page 2A00:23C4:2C9F:9B01:919B:BB42:1F81:E0CC (talk) 22:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo route needs to be added

[edit]

All of the destinations seem correct apart from the new Oslo route needs adding to EasjJet list of routes please. 2A00:23C8:1C81:9701:42B4:684F:AD25:573D (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Liverpool_John_Lennon_Airport&oldid=1257460498"