Talk:Liverpool Exchange railway station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liverpool Exchange railway station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Merseyside Mid‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Last Train

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7418180.stm gives a different engine and destination.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Oliver Cromwell", shown in a photo from the above link, did not operate from Liverpool Exchange - and indeed not from Lime Street, on the last BR steam Train (11 August 1968) - it took over the train at Manchester Victoria. RuthAS (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acronyms

Redrose64, you changed proper names of companies to acronyms stating it was to stop repetition. There is no repetition in the article. Introducing acronyms confuses the lay reader. Introducing acronyms is not preventing repetition. These rail article are not for rail buffs, which all these acronyms the buffs are familiar with. Good writing does not have acronyms unless it is an accepted acronym like AEG, ICI, etc.188.223.113.80 (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were within MOS:ACRO: by putting the acronym in parenthesis following the full term, this defines the acronym; thereafter the acronym may be used in replacement for the full term without needing to be redefined. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool Exchange railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040617012211/http://www.ronniesoo.com/ronnie/images/mercury.jpg to http://www.ronniesoo.com/ronnie/images/mercury.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]