Jump to content

Talk:Live at Benaroya Hall with the Seattle Symphony/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]
Done

--Another Believer (Talk) 04:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Live at Benaroya Hall with the Seattle Symphony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Review is complete. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 17:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Well-written and well researched article. Accessibility and lack of sources in some areas hinder the article from being a GA. Otherwise, good work.
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • Infobox: What genre(s) are found in the album. Remember to cite sources for the genre(s) in the body.
Added pop rock to the infobox and first paragraph of the Composition section, per Allmusic. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Background: ...and the (symphony) charts don't change the songs... Use square brackets instead of normal parentheses.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Composition: Specify origin and profession of Buckmaster.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Composition: Per source, Feveyear also mixed and mastered the album, which is worth mentioning here.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Critical reception: but summarized his review with "Things aren't perfect; they're still beautiful." -> but summarized his review by saying that "Things aren't perfect; they're still beautiful." Flows better.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Track listing: Use the {{track listing}} template to better organize the list into a table.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Track listing: What source did you find the track listing? Cite. Avoid using a source already used here to cite as it reduces reliability of the article info.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personnel: Split into two columns: Use {{col-start}} and {{col-end}} at the beginning and end (respectively) of the entire list, and {{col-2}} at the beginning of each column.
The section is already split into two columns, with the command to adjust depends on users' computer settings. I don't see how the forced split commands are an improvement to the article. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, a lot of articles force split. It avoids the need of scrolling down a page so much. However, since this isn't part of the criteria and it isn't that big of an issue, I can accept the way it is right now. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I went with the "Div col" template, per WikiProject Albums | Article body | Personnel. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personnel: Where are these credits adapted from? Cite.
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chart performance: Put this info into a table for better accessibility. Rename heading to "Charts".
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 21:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to offer feedback. More improvements to come. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's that. All issues have been addressed in less than 24 hours. Pass.
Again, thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Np. :) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.