Talk:Live and Learn (Falling Skies)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 20:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Picture: Add a decent rationale on the images page other than "to illustrate the episode"
Done - Intro: Is this episode called "Pilot" or "Live and Learn"? Most show's first episode are just called "Pliot". Is there a source for this? Done
- Intro: Link first season Done
Intro: "In the United States, the two-hour series premiere achieved a viewership of 5.91 million, making it the most-watched series premiere of 2011. The episode garnered a 2.0 rating in the 18–49 demographic, translating to 2.6 million viewers according to the Nielsen ratings." This sentence makes no sense. The first part states that it was seen by 5.91 viewers, but the second part says it was watched by only 2.6? Which is which? Note: It does make sense. It means 2.6 million watched the episode in the 18-49 demographic and there were 5.91 overall viewers. Done- Plot: Add who plays who in Parentheses in the plot section Done
- Conception: Any reason why, in "Rodat wrote the pilot episode from an idea which was co-conceived by Spielberg." 'Pilot episode' is bolded? Done
- Conception: "What attracted Spielberg to the project was the story of survival." -> "Spielberg was attracted to the project due to its themes of survival." Done
- Coneception: "He said of this…" -> "He explained, " Done
- Conception: "as it had been done before" Maybe expand, I assume you mean its been done in other media, but this is unclear Done
- Casting and filming: Merge the first "paragraph" with the second Done
- Casting: "…was to gain credibility from his children. He said…" Combine into one sentence Done
- Reception: I'd move the ratings info to be the first part of the section, as is the norm with other episode articles Done
One hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Looking good. Sorry about that one sentence, I read it totally wrong. Passing!--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)