Talk:Live Peace in Toronto 1969/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mdann52 (talk · contribs) 12:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Simple to read through, no real issues there

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Nice list of sources, all of which appear to be reliable and support the text

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Gives context on the album nicely

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image FUR seems fine

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   No issues, a clear pass!