Talk:Live'r Than You'll Ever Be

Live'r Than You'll Ever Be has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

The Rolling Stones Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Live'r Than You'll Ever Be/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 17:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead / Infobox

Live'r Than You'll Ever Be is a bootleg recording of a Rolling Stones concert in Oakland, California from 9 November 1969. --> Live'r Than You'll Ever Be is a bootleg recording of The Rolling Stones' concert in Oakland, California on 9 November 1969.
It was one of the first live rock music bootlegs, and was made notorious as a document of the The Rolling Stones American Tour 1969 whose popularity forced the Stones' label Decca Records to release the live album Get Yer Ya-Yas Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert --> It was one of the first live rock music bootlegs and was made notorious as a document of the their 1969 tour of America. The popularity of the bootleg forced the Stones' label Decca Records to release the live album Get Yer Ya-Yas Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert (1970).
Attach years after album titles with brackets.

Recording and release

Live'r Than You'll Ever Be was recorded by "Dub" from Trademark of Quality using a Sennheiser shotgun microphone and a Uher "Report 4000" reel-to-reel tape recorder[2] and was the first audience-recorded bootleg to be mastered and distributed;[3] some sources consider it the first live bootleg --> Live'r Than You'll Ever Be was recorded by "Dub" from Trademark of Quality using a Sennheiser shotgun microphone and a Uher "Report 4000" reel-to-reel tape recorder. It was the first audience-recorded bootleg to be mastered and distributed;[3] some sources consider it the first live bootleg.

Reception

Everything looks good. Not sure if "The sleeve's generic design was later copied by The Who's 1970 album Live at Leeds." belongs in this section though.

Track listing

I know this isn't required, but how about using the track listing template?

Personnel

Should probably move the image up a bit, so it doesn't disturb the references.

Done I changed the "reception" section to "reception and influence" to make a stronger case for how it affected others as critics and musicians. I did not use {{Track listing}} because I dislike it. Anything else? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good to me. Passing the article. Great work! Statυs (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sister Morphine label ???

Mentioning a "release" on the home burnt CDR only label "Sister Morphine" is more than inappropriate IMO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.20.14.162 (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@91.20.14.162: How so? I don't understand what the problem is? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]