Talk:Little Women (2019 film)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Noticed that the last reviewer left without actually reviewing, so I'm going to try leaving most of my suggestions below. As of right now, this article is well-written and I believe it will become a good one real soon. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per the film's billing block, I would remove all names in the infobox following Meryl Streep. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those other names are in the billing block though. See the bottom of the poster. Rusted AutoParts 04:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All images (other than the poster) are free to use so they pass. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The last caption has a typo, so I would change "the Academy Award" to "the Academy Awards". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the release section, change "released the first stills" to "released the first stills of the film". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also in the release section, I suggest adding the year to the last sentence that ends with "August 25". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the "box office" section, I would change "finishing in fourth" to "finishing fourth". Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Following the fact that the film finished fourth, I would remove the Deadline Hollywood reference since it states the film earned $16.5 million in its first three days, contradicting Box Mojo and the article that state the film earned $16.8 million. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I would add the fact that in its five days, the film finished fourth behind Frozen II. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 22:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Other than that, the article's "critical response", and "accolades" sections both pass.

Other than all the suggestions above, I would advise moving the "music" sub-section under production into its own section per WP:FILMSCORE. Along with this, the {{Infobox album}} template should be added to the article, along with a tracklisting for the album (which can be found here). Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 23:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I believe I've made all of the suggested changes. Please let me know if there are any others you believe would be appropriate! Thank you again, Some Dude From North Carolina! KyleJoan^talk 03:16, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·