Talk:Little Saigon/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Little Saigon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
See also
Also see Talk:Little Hanoi and Talk:Little Vietnam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basdrhnrnz (talk • contribs) 06:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Vancouver, BC
I saw the newspaper, and I found out there is Little Saigon in Vancouver. should I add that? If so, should we change the category from the U.S. to North America? http://www.metronews.ca/vancouver/local/article/990568--little-saigon-gets-the-nod-from-city-council --Argon007 (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Toronto, ON
More northern Vietnamese were received by Canada. Read below on Page 7.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~salaff/conference/papers/MPhan-DraftSinoVietnamese.pdf
Portland, Oregon
I was surprised to see Portland, Oregon umentioned here. There is a significant Vietnamese American population in the area, mostly centered around Sandy Boulevard and 82nd street. The estimates I heard were over 35,000 Vietnamese Americans live here.
Oakland, Ca
San Pablo is NOT a suburb of Oakland. This is not even close... Oakland is in Alameda County. San Pablo is Contra Costa County.
That would be like saying that San Rafael is a suburb of San Francisco...
- Wrong. Just because they're in different but adjacent counties, it does not necessarily mean they're not suburbs of a major city. For example, Irvine is way deep in Orange County, but it is still a suburb of Los Angeles area, just not a very close one.
San Pablo does not have a strong presence of a Vietnamese-American community--I don't think we should have San Pablo as part of the article.
Orange County, CA
About 50 miles north of Camp Pendleton, Westminster was once a predominantly white middle-class suburban city of Orange County with ample farmland, but the city later experienced a decline by the 1970s. What on Earth does Camp Pendleton have to with any of this? I'm not sure if most OC residents even know where it is. Perhaps the suggestion is that former residents of Camp Pendleton moved to Westminster...? That seems rather odd. I'm deleting it; feel free to re-add it if there's some reason it should be in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.189.236 (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Camp Pendleton served as one of the major processing centers for the Vietnamese refugees in 1975. This fact is already mentioned earlier in the article. DHN (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Little Saigon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.kcra.com/news/22417299/detail.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.kcra.com/news/22515893/detail.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110013359/http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/listings/2003/06/airtalk_20030623.shtml to http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/listings/2003/06/airtalk_20030623.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040217205912/http://www.asianweek.com/051796/LittleSaigon.html to http://www.asianweek.com/051796/LittleSaigon.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080712112406/http://www.uli.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home to http://www.uli.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=126250&TEMPLATE=%2FCM%2FContentDisplay.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Little Saigon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928000217/http://calitoday.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=411a3441a656f7ec850352ec00b2ddeb to http://calitoday.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=411a3441a656f7ec850352ec00b2ddeb
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Chinese characters
Some anonymous editors kept trying to add some Sinitic characters to the article. Some of these are supposedly Nom characters, which haven't been used for almost 100 years. This concept might have a Chinese name, but these editors are trying to present these as Vietnamese. Unless these terms have a source indicating that they're used, they don't belong in this article. DHN (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)