Talk:Litpack
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was recently {{prod}}ded, with the justification "Unverified, promotional, part of a walled garden..."
I did a google scholar search on LITPACK. Hundreds of google hits.
So, how would the wikipedia make a fair, policy-based decision as to whether the topic was verifiably notable? Geo Swan (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)