Talk:Lithium chloride

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Occupational Safety and Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Talbott J. H. (1950). "Use of lithium salts as a substitute for sodium chloride". Arch Med Interna. 85 (1): 1–10. PMID: 15398859.
L. W. Hanlon, M. Romaine, F. J. Gilroy. (1949). "Lithium Chloride as a Substitute for Sodium Chloride in the Diet". Journal of the American Medical Association. 139 (11): 688–692.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Scientific articles about the Lithium Chloride poisoning.--Stone 12:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual

"Lithium salts affect the central nervous system; see lithium pharmacology for more details." I noticed that this isn't how wikipedia usually works...refrencing other articles. I don't know... just bringing it up99.246.253.134 (talk) 01:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous: Solulability of "83g/100mL" in first paragraph. is it per deciliter, or per liter, as noted in the sidebar? One of them must be wrong.71.202.208.217 (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]