Talk:Literature review

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[untitled]

Could someone add up to the information please?--Quinlan Vos 14:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[untitled]

how is it possible to retrieve from the link below? It asks for a password. thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.95.236 (talk) 14:18, 18 January 2007‎ (UTC)[reply]

I moved the link from article here since it is mostly useless and hard to verify.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.mminf.univie.ac.at/wiki/index.php/Englischer_Ausdruck" SOURCES OF LITERATURE REVIEW

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Further Reading Citation

I removed from the extra readings this citation: taneka.j 1999 because it is incomplete. Does anyone know the title of this? Roseclearfield (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review vs. systematic review vs. meta-analysis

Literature review vs. systematic review vs. survey article vs. meta-analysis should be differentiated more exactly, taking into account, that the definitions may vary based between and within fields of knowledge. A short summary of the differences may be sufficient for this article, the more narrow articles could provide further details. However, current differentiation by me is not enough, a bit more is needed. Forp (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC) (Edited Feb 18)[reply]