Talk:Literature Wales

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV check

Labeling as {{pov-check}}, as it was written by apparently a representative (user:Academi, contributions), and includes phrases like "internationally respected", "foremost", "invaluable", "ultimate". Arbitrary username 13:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a great advert, much of it in Managementspeak. I'll try editing out some of the adjectives and the superlatives and see if that helps. If Academi does what it says it does, it should weed out these words anyway, as they're bad writing, and the Academi is supposed to encourage good writing. Gwaka Lumpa 23:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you agree I've changed it enough to remove the tag. Gwaka Lumpa 00:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move page to Academi

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved by User:DennyColt at 07:07 UTC, 24 March 2007 cab 08:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Welsh Academy → Academi — to move poor English translation to the correct name. It's called Academi, and its website uses that name and not "The Welsh Academy", which is hardly ever used except by English academics in England Trident13 14:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

Support. Wikipedia:Use English is generally superceded in the case where a non-English name is the undisputed official and self-identifying name of an entity; see Wikipedia:Naming conflict#Proper nouns. cab 01:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

- Rgds, - Trident13 14:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The Academi

Note that, the above discussion notwithstanding, the organization refers to itself in English (on its website and in its publications) as the Academi. -- Picapica 11:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understand where you are comng from, but unless there are numerous things called "X", wikipedia convention doesn't include "the" in the article name. Rgds, - Trident13 12:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand me. I was in no way proposing an alteration to the article's title (I agree with you entirely that it is correct as it stands) -- just explaining my insertion of the word "the" in several places in sentences in the text, in the same way that the Academi itself does when writing about itself in English. Cheers. -- Picapica 21:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we are violently agreeing here - sorry! Rgds, - Trident13 21:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Literature Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727195359/http://www.welshicons.org.uk/news/literature/academi-and-ty-newydd-join-to-create-literature-wales/ to http://www.welshicons.org.uk/news/literature/academi-and-ty-newydd-join-to-create-literature-wales/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Literature Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402181430/http://www.academi.org/members-committee/ to http://www.academi.org/members-committee/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]