Talk:Literacy test

A fact from Literacy test appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 May 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 banned literacy tests as a voting qualification in the U.S.?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/May.

Wikipedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Untitled

This article is currently exclusively about the United States, so could use a bit more global perspective. I know other countries have had literacy test requirements for voting; we should have some information on which ones, why, and when (if) they were abolished. Likewise for immigration; I believe many countries still require literacy in the local language as a condition of immigration, and certainly of naturalization. Or if people feel that the U.S. context is sufficiently different to require its own article, then this should be moved to literacy test (United States), and a more general article created. --Delirium 19:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of Application

In the article, it indicates that the tests were applied in an unfair manner, disenfranchising literate African Americans. A description of how the application of the tests prevented literate persons from passing would be helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.186.2 (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Literacy tests were examinations to see if a person could read and/or write. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.18.50 (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the context of the history of the United States, this is incorrect. What were referred to as "literacy" tests were rigged for failure, and Whites were exempt from taking them. Read the sourced content already in the article. TricksterWolf (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbles in a bar of soap

"Examples of questions asked of Blacks in Alabama included: naming all sixty-seven county judges in the state, naming the date on which Oklahoma was admitted to the Union, and declaring how many bubbles are in a bar of soap."

This last question sounds like the sort of thing that Google would ask at a job interview. --ABehrens (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google did ask this sort of question for the first six months, then stopped when it was shown that they didn't have any value at selecting good candidates. That was 21 years ago, but the myth that Google asks these questions remains strong. (Source: I've been an interviewer at Google for 13 years.) NeilFraser (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm deleting that comment and the one adjacent to it as the source "Caro" and "Robert Caro" have no links to anything and the statement is so outrageous and biased I'm inclined to believe it's either propaganda to serve a political agenda or out-right vandalism.(7 & 8)Jonny Quick (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Literacy test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120222144408/http://www.texancultures.utsa.edu/newtexans/literacy.htm to http://www.texancultures.utsa.edu/newtexans/literacy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]