Talk:Listed buildings in Sheffield

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Listed buildings in Sheffield is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sheffield Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criteria for adding to the list

Is this list intended to be exhaustive? Or are we deliberately keeping it down to the most interesting of the listed buildings? I was about to put in the two listed buildings in Ecclesall woods (the charcoal burner's grave, and a stone bridge [1]) but thought I'd ask before jumping in. --VinceBowdren 22:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the two criteria for inclusion in this page are to be listed and to be in Sheffield. I have tried to fill out all of the Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings. But I think that Grade II buildings are fairly numerous, and are also often things like mileposts that would be difficult to write an article on, so I have only be added these if I or someone else has written an article about them. --JeremyA 04:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the above message but added Cemetery Road Baptist Church even though it is only Grade II as I plan to write an article for it. Also added the link to the Listed Buildings page on Sheffield City Council website but not sure whether I should have linked to the document directly? It's possible that the link might die in future but the page is more likely to be stable - anyway the document link is here: [2] --Andycole 21:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link is fine. I changed the section heading to 'References' and added Images of England—the main site that I have used as a reference for this page. —JeremyA 23:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Listed buildings in Sheffield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100724035620/http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/planning-and-city-development/urban-design--conservation/listed-buildings to http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/planning-and-city-development/urban-design--conservation/listed-buildings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]