This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
The Arran ones were out for some reason. I have looked at the island ones but I fear you may need a Highlands sub-project to check them all. BenMacDui13:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With the prefixing letters it can be easy to think yourself into the wrong 100km square - clearly that's happened on occasion - that's what comes of transcribing 100's of 6-fig grid refs from the paper maps at one go, I guess! BTW - curious that palindrome thing with Glenelg - I'm not aware of any longer place-names that do that - discounting the lines concerning about the Panama Canal. Geopersona (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it that there are waterfall "articles" here where the article consists of only one line and a {{coord}}? I'd suggest moving the coords to this list article and get rid of the single-line "articles". - Denimadept (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It may be that some can be worked up into articles though I imagine most would never make it - plenty which occur in the list are always going to be insufficiently notable to have their own articles. cheers Geopersona (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User PaWili has deleted this entry asserting it is not a waterfall. The name is clearly descriptive of a point in Glencoe at which three watercourses meet and is thus named on OS maps. There is a frequently photographed waterfall at that location which is commonly referred to by the same name- just do an image search on the name to find multiple references to it So you might say that the name does refer - in a transferred sense, which commonly occurs with toponyms - to a waterfall. Geopersona (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]