Talk:List of used book conditions
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Less formal designations?
[edit]I'd like to see some sort of explanation of less formal terms such as "slightly foxed" (I'm told this derives from Ferric Oxide, but haven't been able to find a more thorough explanation). Anyone here who's a book dealer or expert who could contribute? Critterkeeper (talk) 03:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree the definitions should be less formal. This is the first time I've seen a wikipedia article that says in the body "The words below are direct quotations and thus should not be changed." I removed that notice.
- Someone must have deleted the mention of "slightly foxed" from the article. See foxing for an explanation of that term.
- As it is, the list is missing "reading copy" which appears on Abebooks' version of this list. --Marc Kupper|talk 00:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hey guys - this article is about the words used to put books in different collectable levels. Words that tell us why a book is on what level, such as "foxing", are on a different list - a book collecting glossary. Here is an example of such a list outside of Wikipedia: AbeBooks' Glossary of Book Terms . -GroveGuy (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of used book conditions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.powells.com/rarebooks/bookbasics.html#condition
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)