Jump to content

Talk:List of threatened historic sites in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed criteria for historic

[edit]

Historicality of sites needs to be documented. Listing on the National Register of Historic Places suffices, but is not present for many historic sites in private hands.

Hmm, may be better to limit list to places listed on the National Register of Historic Places in the United States. The majority of these sites are in private hands. Many suffer threats from development, as well as from neglect, deterioration, damage from weather and other forces. If we limit to the RHPs only it is still an important list to develop, and one dimension of eligibility is very well defined. The degree to which a site is "threatened" or "highly threatened" may be more subjective. And it may be too hard to establish historicality and threat levels simultaneously. And if limit to RHPs, then relationship of this list to WP:NRHP is obvious and clear. So that is the way i am inclined to go, will define it that way in the article. doncram (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed criteria for threatened

[edit]

Must be designated as threatened or endangered by an organization.

yeah - the article should define how sites are selected for this list.--Appraiser (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of threatened historic sites in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of threatened historic sites in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]