Talk:List of the largest cannon by caliber

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of the largest cannon by caliber article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry CL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Is this page misnamed?

From the article on caliber, I would assume these cannons are ranked by bore size. If they were ranked by caliber, it should be the cannon with hola the longest barrel length. Is this convention not used for these guns? Stevetac (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dardanelles Gun

Şahi was used in the Conquest of Constantinapole therefore it has to be built before 1453. Article states it was built in 1464, it should be fixed. I'm changing it to 1452 to show a more accurate date until some has sources to confirm the exact time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.225.211 (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have found some information on the web that states it was completed in Edirne in january 1452 and was moved to Istanbul in two months - http://tarihimiz.net/v3/Haberler/OsmanliTarihi2/FATIH-IN-SAHI-TOPLARI.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.225.211 (talk) 09:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paixsans Monster mortar

On this list, little known Paixsans Monster mortar takes first place with caliber of 975mm. However, I have serious doubts about accuracy of this claim. - On other sources I found that caliber of this weapon is 22 french inches (around 60cm), and that 975mm is outer diameter of barrel. - weight of bomb is stated at 500 kg. At caliber of 975mm it would mean it is less dense than water - very unlikely for iron grenade, filled with explosive. - at illustration given in the article it is clear that diameter of cannon is around 1/2 of the height of the soldier standing by - giving it more likely that caliber given in the article is actually outer diameter of the barrel.

Also, isn't it strange that all other weapons on the list have links, more details in separate articles, etc?

Provide a scholarly reference for the caliber, then we can act. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Here is one http://books.google.com/books?id=5Wi6ou1LGucC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=%22Mortier+monstre%22&source=bl&ots=lDHieFR3re&sig=WHnktxIxWcMLP-SYLmDiDdUNo3o&hl=en&ei=0VNCSqe3Ap2ZjAf1g4nuBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2

Also, you should put source to claim about caliber, not write a false claim and ask from other to disprove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.37.10 (talk) 12:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the caliber to 60 cm and added another source which supports this value. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking down the list into three sections

I tried to give my reasons in the lead. Before, it way really comparing apples with oranges. Now, don't ask me why they put on the pics iron balls next to the Tsar Cannon and the one of the Knights Hospitaller! In my view, they are clearly bombards firing stone balls (actually, the former cannon probably never fired a shot). Perhaps someone can do some research there. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 02:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Tsar Cannon 99.9% likely never fired a shot. And they have put iron balls next to it simply out of decorative reasons. Zloidooraque (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Malik-e-Maidan

The Malik-e-Maidan in Bijapur India should be included in this list. It has a bore size of 700mm. The wikipedia article about the Malik-e-Maidan claims it to be the largest medival cannon ever built. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.179.91.197 (talk) 09:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic new entries

A number of older cannon has been added over the years in the categories stone balls and iron balls and shot whose caliber has not been sourced, namely Malik-i-Maidan, Jaivana, Dalmadal/Dala Mardana and Zamzama. Another entry, the Basilic (cannon), is sourced, but the value seems more of a modern guesstimate, less the result of reliable historical documentation or modern measurements. I am of the view that the former pieces should be removed from the list until reliable, scholarly sources can be put forward, while the latter is debatable for its inevitable vagueness. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this list meant to be comprehensive?

Because during the Polotsk Capture of 1563 there were used three named guns of calibers 660, 600 and 550 mm. All have entries about their production in chronicles and all are documented they were actually used. At least one of them, 600mm 'Pavlin' is known to shoot stone and iron shots and was an actual cannon (as opposed to bombards). 3 shots of it were enough for Smolensk to surrender in its time. Zloidooraque (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of the largest cannon by caliber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110805194124/http://www.royalarmouries.org/visit-us/fort-nelson/galleries to http://www.royalarmouries.org/visit-us/fort-nelson/galleries

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Friesack, Faule Grete, ca. 1950.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Hitler-gustav-railway-gun.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Bull's Big Babylon

It has its own page in the WP under "Project Babylon" and I think it deserves a honrary mention with a bore of 1 meter and a length of over 150 meters as a lot of expensive parts had already been ordered and manufactured and since it was designed by an established expert one could assume that it would have worked hat the creator not been shot and the delivery of the parts blocked. It would have been the largest gun with the largest caliber and with the explicit potential to shoot payload into orbit (not just reaching space and falling back directly). So to say the largest gun completely developed and "in production" although barely. JB. --92.193.235.189 (talk) 21:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tsar Gun Hoax

1. Not a cannon rather shotgun. It was intended for shots only.

2. There was no Tsardom of Russia. It was Grand duchy of Moscow till 1721 and All-Russian Empire after. Dieſelmaus (talk) 07:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]