Talk:List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

On 13 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center to List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001). The result of the discussion was MOVED.

On 23 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Speedy Delete?

This list is not non-sense. It is a sourced list of the tenents in WTC7 prior to that building's collapse. It is part of a series of list-articles, including One World Trade Center tenants (article started September 14th 2001) and Two World Trade Center tenants (article started September 17th 2001). Seabhcán 22:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

I'd like to rename these articles to the standard list style:

Any objections? Seabhcán 08:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: MOVED. There has been no opposition. (non-admin closure) Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center → List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) Requesting move because there is a brand new building and this article could lead to a false impression that the tenants occupy the new 7 WTC. --Aaron106 (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 17:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 23 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ^Clyde!_Franklin! 18:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) → List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center – I am requesting a page move because the title that I want this article changed to is a redirect to this same article: List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001). Also, there is no article about the tenants for the new 7 World Trade Center and it has been built for 16 years. --Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This proposed move does nothing to help clarity, in fact, it would only create confusion. I note that there is a proposal to split 7 World Trade Center and 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001); the two are independently notable and should have their own article. That would make this RM moot. 162 etc. (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: To form a clearer consensus echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. If you want to add the current tenants, then it would create justification for the move. As it stands, the proposed title would not accurately describe the contents of the article. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The new building is notable and it has had tenants too, so we should make it clear which building's tenants are being listed. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.