Talk:List of surviving Consolidated PBY Catalinas

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

A new article of PBY Catalina Survivors is based on data extracted from a PDF file on the Catalina Society website, minus wrecks, partial airframes and no-hopers, with added corrections, references, links and other information. Note: In the main article PBY Catalina, I think we need some details of variants beyond the USN PBY- series, eg OA-10A, Canso, PB2B-1, etc. PeterWD (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The American Airpower Museum's PBY

The current state of the PBY cat at the airpower museum isn't Airworthy, the aircraft is still under restoration due to a corroded center fuel tank as well as other minor problems Tu-49 (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of surviving Consolidated PBY Catalinas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916160645/http://www.yanksair.com/index.html to http://www.yanksair.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CF-NJL

I recently visited CF-NJL in 2022, and have loosely followed its stay over the past two decades that it's been stored there. From what I've heard over the years, the owner comes out about once a year and runs the engines to keep them lubricated. There is also occasional maintenance on the airframe as well - most recently in 2022 where all the control surfaces were removed to be refurbished back to airworthy condition (if I'm not mistaken, the control surfaces are fabric).

I strongly believe - but also can't confirm - that the aircraft is airworthy - or at least close to it. It's also not seeing enough work to be considered going under restoration, either. Still, considering it's been in a hangar for decades, I wonder if it will fly again.

I added a note to the article implying it may be airworthy, and added a ^{[citation needed]} tag to it. If someone can find a proper citation for it, I'd appreciate it because finding non-original research on this is nearly impossible. The Legacy (talk) 23:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]