Talk:List of stations in London fare zone 3

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of stations in London fare zone 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of stations in London fare zone 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013151520/http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/news.php?id=412 to http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/news.php?id=412

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of stations in London fare zone 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071107063732/http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/news.php?id=518 to http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/news.php?id=518

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hello. Regarding this recent edit, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Order of article elements suggests to me (and as detected by AWB) that the only thing appearing after Category is Stub. Thanks. JabberJaw (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interlanguage links were listed after Stub, but removed in this edit by someone who assumed that Wikidata would remove the necessity for interlanguage links but didn't realise the severe limitations of Wikidata. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok - so that shows that my edit was not incorrect in terms of current guidelines. my next Qu.s would be, why wasn't this 'problem/issue' detected for 5 years? and why does MOS/AWB still suggest otherwise (given the only reason I was here was because of AWB)? Thanks. JabberJaw (talk) 23:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AWB is a pain, it isn't always in sync with normal practices. It assumes that any code that resembles a template transclusion {{...}} which occurs in the last section of the article must be a footer template, and must be gathered together after the external links and before the defaultsort, unless it can be positively identified as one of a number of exceptions - such as {{commons category}}, defaultsort or a stub template. {{interwiki extra}} is probably not in the AWB list of exceptions, and I don't know where that is held so can't amend it. There are not many pages that use the template - just 22 at the time of writing, so it's almost certainly something that few people are aware of. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:09, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok - I understand. I would also say that AWB is useful if it gets policy clarified though. Maybe a report/feedback to AWB re this issue will help out, as will a comment to MOS talkpage re. the lapse. I assume AWB follow things such as MOS, so having that updated will flow back into AWB. Further, given just 22 instances as mentioned, is it so problematic if they happen to be auto-moved? (i.e. what functionality breaks when moved?) Anyway, I will endeavour to avoid these 22 exceptions from now on if I see them again! Thanks JabberJaw (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]