Talk:List of stars in Crux

Re Languages

I intend to remove the Portuguese names, as they are never (apart from Mimosa, of course) used in English. Any objections? Rothorpe (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree (but what about Chinese names referred to in Allen?) --Metebelis (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What and where are they? Rothorpe (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha and Beta

Alpha Crucis' article says it is the brightest in Crux with brighness of 0.77. So why this list has it second to Beta with only 1.40 brightness? 85.76.73.19 (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article lists the brightness of the two components - together they shine at 0.77. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Different point of view, I see. This list has separately Alpha¹/Alpha A and Alpha²/Alpha B, while Alpha Crucis (article which both components links go) considers them one star. 85.76.73.19 (talk) 04:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's so crazy. The list would must consider Alpha Crucis both A and B. When you see the Crux, Acrux is so far the brightest, and you see as one. It doesn't matter if it is double. The list confuses to readers, and it's not Wikipedia style, I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.58.51.66 (talk) 03:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of stars in Crux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227032716/http://www.uranometriaargentina.com/ to http://www.uranometriaargentina.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Acrux treated differently from others?

Why are the components of Acrux listed separately, while other star systems, even optical doubles, are listed as one star? It is especially confusing when coming from the Crux article, which says that Acrux is the brightest. Nurg (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]