Talk:List of sign languages

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of sign languages article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Deaf

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Add ISO 639-3 codes?

I wonder if it would help if we add a column to these tables for a language's ISO 639-3 code, when it has one. It seems rather odd that when we use those codes in so many places in WP, we haven't used them here. Of course, a lot of sign languages don't have ISO codes, but this will be one way of calling attention to that fact. BTW, I have a readily-available list, already sorted by continent and language name, so it would be fairly easy for me to do this. In other words, if others agree, I'm happy to be the one to do the grunt-work. Ping me if you have comments. AlbertBickford (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I see the point. We used to use ISO codes in a lot of family articles, and this page, because we didn't have individual articles on the languages. I've been removing them as language articles were created. Other editors have been removing them too; the lack of objection over several years constitutes silent consensus. The only place I can think of where we still use them is spurious language (because many of those "languages" still do not have articles) and in the list of artificial languages that mentions Kotava and Romanova, whose articles have been deleted as not notable. If we restore them here, why not add them to thousands of family articles? I don't see any advantage in doing that. — kwami (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I didn't know about that history. I'm fine with leaving them out. AlbertBickford (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 639 followup

ISO 639-3 codepoints for signed languages are as follows: ads, aed, aen, afg, ajs, ase, asf, asp, asq, asw, bfi, bfk, bog, bqn, bqy, bvl, bvs, bzs, cds, csc, csd, cse, csf, csg, csl, csn, csq, csr, csx, doq, dse, dsl, dsz, ecs, ehs, esl, esn, eso, eth, fcs, fse, fsl, fss, gds, gse, gsg, gsm, gss, gus, hab, haf, hds, hks, hos, hps, hsh, hsl, icl, iks, ils, inl, ins, ise, isg, isr, jcs, jhs, jks, jls, jos, jsl, jus, kgi, kvk, lbs, lgs, lls, lsb, lsc, lsg, lsl, lsn, lso, lsp, lst, lsv, lsw, lsy, lws, mdl, mfs, mre, msd, msr, mzc, mzg, mzy, nbs, ncs, nsi, nsl, nsp, nsr, nzs, okl, pgz, pks, prl, prz, psc, psd, psg, psl, pso, psp, psr, pys, rib, rms, rnb, rsi, rsl, rsm, rsn, sdl, sfb, sfs, sgg, sgx, slf, sls, sqk, sqs, sqx, ssp, ssr, svk, swl, syy, szs, tse, tsm, tsq, tss, tsy, tza, ugn, ugy, ukl, uks, vsi, vsl, vsv, wbs, xki, xml, xms, yds, ygs, yhs, ysl, ysm, zib, and zsl.

That's how little space this section would take up in the article body. — Arlo James Barnes 02:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]