Talk:List of shipwrecks in 1952

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Margarita

The Times (Dec 27, 1952) called it the Margareta.

File:Flying Enterprise.JPG

Recently, MB298 removed File:Flying Enterprise.JPG from the list because it is a non-free image that did not have a NFUR for use in the list. I'm satisfied that the removal for the reason given was a valid one. However, I also believe that the image is a valid addition to this list. I asked MB298 for an opinion on the inclusion of the image with a NFUR and was referred to WP:NFLISTS. Part 4 of NFLISTS states that it is preferred not to repeat the use. This does not forbid the use of the image though. Part 6 of NFLISTS states that images that are used only to visually identify elements in the article should be used as sparingly as possible. This is adhered to with shipwreck lists by only using images of actual sinkings or wrecks. General photographs of the ships involved are not used. By adhering to this, the lists are not overrun by images and those that do appear significantly add to the list.

Proposal

That File:Flying Enterprise.JPG be restored to the list, with a suitable NFUR added to enable its use in the list. Please indicate your support or objection below. Discussion above the !votes please. Mjroots (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support as proposer. Mjroots (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have a longer answer on my talk page, however after review of WP:NFLISTS, it seems to be that use of this image would be acceptable, so therefore weak support, as I am not entirely convinced the image is necessary. MB298 (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MB298: given a lack of objections in a fortnight, and your comments above, I have added a NFUR for use in this list. I will now restore the list to its previous state. As I said above, your edits were valid for the reasons stated and this should not be taken as any criticism of such edit. Mjroots (talk) 21:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of shipwrecks in 1952. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080305055838/http://www.stivestrust.co.uk/html/1946_-_1962.HTM to http://www.stivestrust.co.uk/html/1946_-_1962.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]