Talk:List of script typefaces

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Typography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Part of a set of Samples of typefaces

Oppose This list of Script typefaces is part of a set of lists, and should not be deleted. There is certainly room for improvement in every one of these lists, including much missing information, but the samples are useful for webmasters. Here is the rest of the set:

This list is not an orphan, there are seven links to it, including the five above. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And there is no context for any of them, so they will all be deleted, thanks for bringing them to my attention. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I find this list useful. Diego Torquemada (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose Why is this article not listed on its proposal date? Why is this discussion not taking place in the usual location? This article is provides illustration for Script (typefaces) without adding clutter there. ⇔ ChristTrekker 19:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an AfD. Darrenhusted (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the dated prod template. In my opinion, the article is useful and it does have links. It does have red links and missing information in the two tables, but I intend to improve the article with samples and probably other fonts. I would invite other editors to do the same. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Handwriting" is spelled wrong in the image of Lucida Handwriting.

"Handwriting" is spelled wrong in the image of Lucida Handwriting. --Captain Infinity (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why the no references template was removed.

See Wikipedia talk:Typeface list collaboration#Samples of script typefaces for an explanation why the no references template has been removed. Please do not put it back without reading that explanation. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved due to lack of any opposition. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samples of script typefaces → List of script typefaces – title should reflect the content: a list of examples 68.151.25.115 (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.