Talk:List of remastering software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Mac

Is it worth noting the Mac installer, it lets you pick out what you want. E.g, printer drivers, Rosetta, Quicktime 7, at least another ten things. 86.139.154.48 (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

This crap is why people are running away from Wikipedia (it's certainly why I no longer bother to log in). You're throwing bureaucracy (poorly justified, I might add) at editors in order to protect your little pet article. The listed links were just fine; WP:NOTDIR doesn't apply because this is a list page and those pieces of software were completely relevant. It would be one thing if this was the "Remastering software" page, but there's no reason a list of remastering software should omit items simply because they have no article. If you're really worried, go make one yourself. I'm reverting this crap. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add that WP:SNOW is relevant in intent here, but nobody cares about it anymore here, anyway. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First, it is Fleet Command, not Fleet Commander. Second, WP:STANDALONE and WP:LINKFARM specifically prohibits external links in standalone lists. Third, WP:SNOW does not apply here. The only thing that applies here is that you are spamming and insulting us all; if you do not stop, you might be blocked from editing. Fleet Command (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, trying to improve an article that you keep shortening is spamming and calling you out is flaming. Oh, but feel free to try to get a block on an entire campus IP because one person disagreed with you; I'd love to see you try. Maybe you should make some articles on those links instead of blanking everything? They're no more or less relevant than the other pieces of software, meaning they're encyclopedic and a good editor would just make articles out of them. Also, since you made the first revert, you'll trigger 3RR (WP:EW) pretty soon. You know, if you really want to go down the "stickler for rules" instead of "use some common sense" road. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I do agree these links are unhelpful (not notable), FleetCommand should not be canvassing other editors to support his viewpoint.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let it go if others think they're not notable (though I think that if nLite is notable, the spiritual successors should be notable as well). I would encourage someone to add articles for the links at some point. The history revision with the links included is [1] if anybody wishes to add articles for any of them. 148.61.250.135 (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you are badly wrong on all accounts. First, notability is not inherited. Second, not every item that has an article is automatically notable; that means if the existing articles or the articles that you create later are not notable, they will be deleted; subsequently their links will be removed from this list. Third, Notability requires verifiable evidence. So do you have proof that what you think is notable is actually notable? Fleet Command (talk) 07:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I consider most remastering software to be not notable due to the lack of usage of the term online and the scant use of such tools.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of remastering software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051229025251/http://www.garfio.org.ar/ to http://www.garfio.org.ar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Common name

I've started a discussion about a possibly more widely used WP:COMMONNAME at Talk:Software_remastering#Common_name --PaulT2022 (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]