Talk:List of reentering space debris

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of reentering space debris article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kosmos 954

Shouldn't Kosmos 954 be on this list? It survived reentry and spewed nuclear contamination across the ground. 70.49.124.157 (talk) 08:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't an especially large satellite. Notable, sure, but that's already addressed on the article's website.--RadioFan (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting by mass

Sorting by mass does not work, since it uses alphabetical order so 10 -> 110 -> 20. Can somebody fix this? I can only fix it by padding with zeros on the left, but it would look strange, I think RubenGarciaHernandez (talk) 21:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One way I have seen to solve this is use Template:Ntsh, but it means putting that template in every box to get the full effect. You put each number in a Ntsh template. Fotaun (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{ntsh|some number}}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of reentering space debris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718022840/http://www.spacesecurity.org/files/WorldCivilSats2006.xls to http://www.spacesecurity.org/files/WorldCivilSats2006.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]