This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This list needs complete reorganisation. I propose that it is reorganised and split by department. That is, if a line runs through a department, it is listed there. I appreciate that this will lead to some duplication, but this seems to me to be a better way to organise it than the current method. Mjroots (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the list could be more user-friendly. But wouldn't you rather organise it by (new) region? The longer lines run through many departments (take Paris–Marseille railway: 75, 94, 91, 77, 89, 21, 71, 69, 38, 26, 84, 13, that's 12 departments). Or maybe group them by region, and then indicate, for instance with numbers, which departments they're in. MarkussepTalk07:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer to keep it by department as these are roughly equivalent British counties. Listing alphabetically is the logical way. Mjroots (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]