Talk:List of private military contractors

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Military history: Intelligence / Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Task Force

Difficult to assign, because of its topic. Finally assigned to Intel task force, because of broad nature of actions, and commonality of intelligence gathering to the assignments. auntieruth (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of private military contractors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071229125418/http://www.galago.co.za/CAT1_025.htm to http://www.galago.co.za/CAT1_025.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G4S is American now?

Understanding that the company bought Wackenhut, but that doesn't automatically make the company American ain't it? While it still remains as this form before it's acquired by Allied Universal, G4S should be in the UK section, not the US. MetroMapFinalRender.svg (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having regard to its less than perfect record, I would be content if it wasn't associated with the UK . Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't really diminish the fact that its ownership and control is still based in London, with its Global Head Office in the city: https://www.g4s.com/en-gb/site-tools/contact-us MetroMapFinalRender.svg (talk) 05:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that should be added to the "notes" section. Right now the HQ is listed in the US, so that can lead to confusion. - wolf 11:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]