Talk:List of preserved BR Standard Class 9F locomotives
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Preserved UK Railway Locomotives Database" links
[edit]For reference...
- "Preserved UK Railway Locomotives Database" links
EdJogg (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Unrestored locos
[edit]The lead says As of 2009, four of the locomotives have not been restored to working order since withdrawal: 92134, 92207, 92219 and 92245 ... these locomotives are not expected to be fully restored in the foreseeable future, but it seems like only 92219 and 92245 are the only two that really aren't under restoration: a fair amount of money and work seems to have gone into both 92134 and 92207 (the latter per the article). Yes, it's not clear when they will be finished, but I gather it's not a major mountain to climb at this point for either one. Would it more more accurate to say that only 92219 and 92245 are not expected to be restored? Noel (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hearimg no adverse comment, I have been bold and modified the intro along the lines indicated. Noel (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
92212 in Film Midsomer Murders
[edit]In Series 14 , Episode 3 "Echoes of the Dead" (2011) drive the locomotive 92212 in the title sequence. --Reneman (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Reneman: Is it significant to the plot? That is, would the story have been affected (adversely or otherwise) if a different loco had been used? If not, it's just trainspotting. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on List of preserved BR Standard Class 9F locomotives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100226181028/http://www.shillingstone.addr.com/in_depth_history.htm to http://www.shillingstone.addr.com/in_depth_history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430145728/http://www.nymr.co.uk/2011/04/cock-o-the-north-unveiled/ to http://www.nymr.co.uk/2011/04/cock-o-the-north-unveiled/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103035404/http://www.cvr-extra.wanadoo.co.uk/92134.htm to http://www.cvr-extra.wanadoo.co.uk/92134.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422045358/http://www.gwsr.com/html/92203.html to http://www.gwsr.com/html/92203.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090728051525/http://www.shillingstone.addr.com/the_morning_star_gallery.htm to http://www.shillingstone.addr.com/the_morning_star_gallery.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101021084408/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/brian.stickland/92219.htm to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/brian.stickland/92219.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
92203 Black Prince nameplates
[edit]Did 92203 Black Prince use the actual nameplates that had been on 70008 Black Prince? 92203 was preserved (though not necessarily named) in 1967; 70008 was withdrawn in January 1967.
Some information about 70008 is in this list of BR 'Britannia' Class locomotives — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.50.165 (talk) 13:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, 70008 had plates in the same style as 70013 Oliver Cromwell, with Gill Sans lettering; but the plates on 92203 were of the same style as on 92220 Evening Star, with serifs on the lettering. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.67.35 (talk) 19:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)