Jump to content

Talk:List of post-punk bands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Updated the links of current bands. --FACT50 19:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just completely redid this page. It now includes sub-headers for Post-Punk influenced 80's bands, as well as notable post-punk centric record labels. --FACT50 18:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Cribs

[edit]

Why are The Cribs in this list? They don't seem at all like post-punk to me, they just seem like indie. Ian 22:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on inclusion

[edit]

Just a few comments; I agree with most of the contemporary bands you have listed and thought I'd suggest that while I don't feel that T.V. on the Radio can really be characterized as post-punk (they lack the noisy/rough edge and more intense energy that I feel is part of that genre) it might be prudent to include Ex-Models and We Are Wolves on the list. Maybe even ...And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead. And was Pavement on there? I didn't check, but they probably should be. And to Ian2203, I say that you can be an indie band and also be post-punk, or not be post-punk. 130.245.230.173 11:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Happyfetusday[reply]

Cleaned up about half of page....

[edit]

I got rid of about half of the non Wiki linked entries. Too tired to get rid of the rest.Crescentia 00:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was just curious, why was this done? I had spent a lot of time last year adding a lot of historically important post-punk bands to this list that do not happen to have Wiki-linked entries. I didn't realize that was a requirement. There are bands that were cut that were more relevant/influential than some bands that weren't, that happen to have links. I'm not criticizing you; I just want clarification. If I want to include a band on a comprehensive historical list such as this one, I have to create a separate Wiki entry for them first??? Greg Fasolino 15:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I am confused because some of your lines between post-punk and New Wave are not clear. I know it is difficult to make a clear distinction, but if some are going to be marked more "new wave" (such as the disclaimer after Human League) the practice should be continued to include New Order, Depeche Mode and a few other bands that ride the line. I looked to this article to help me distinguish between the two, but sometimes the list made it more confusing. The two genres go hand in hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.137.107 (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I grew tired of seeing the incomplete state of this page on my favorite genre of music, and have added back much of what was once spuriously deleted. Note, I have checked, and a band does NOT need to have a separate article on Wikipedia in order to be listed. Many of the bands deleted last year are quite important, influential, and beloved by fans of post-punk. I've been a music journalist since 1984 and wrote about post-punk then and since, in everything from "Trouser Press" to "Creem" to "The Big Takeover," and would appreciate asking before deleting all of what I have added ("Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references"). I would be happy to provide references and citations for anything I have put back. Thank you. Greg Fasolino (talk) 15:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Kaiser Chiefs to the revival section

[edit]

I'm going to add the Kaiser Chiefs to the revival section, and hopefully this time they won't get removed. This is perhaps the only time I've read anything about post-punk music and not seen mention of them, so it makes the article seem lacking.

Seriously, please stop removing them. At best, arguing that they're new wave is splitting hairs, especially considering both genres are nearly one in the same. Need some sources? here you go: http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/19207-employment "there seems to be a mini-wave of UK acts brandishing their accents with a frequency last heard in the early days of post-punk. To these American ears, those vocals are part of what makes the Futureheads and Bloc Party sound as good as they do. Kaiser Chiefs are another of these groups" http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/7087457/review/7070365/employment http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2005/03/live_kaiser_chi.php Here again in this link, mentioned alongside other post-punk acts Editors, The Bravery, and The Killers: http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/43713-an-end-has-a-start And finally, they're even listed as post-punk revival on Wikipedia's own indie rock page.

So, at best, you're splitting hairs here, at worst, making Wiki wildly inconsistent. 72.49.10.81 (talk) 02:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoon

[edit]

I added Spoon to the post-punk influenced section. Here's the source: http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/49260-interview-spoon Specifically: "Pitchfork: You guys seem to have gone through a few phases in your career, to over-generalize a bit. The first two albums were pretty explicitly rooted in a specific strain of post-punk.

BD: Yeah, I didn't think there was anything cooler than Wire and Gang of Four. That is kind of what I was shooting at for a couple of years. " 72.49.8.125 (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XTC were part of Post-Punk

[edit]

Mr. Dodds objected to my inclusion of XTC here (I specifically mention their earlier albums, prior to drummer Terry Chambers' departure, when their music became less angular and rhythm-oriented and more pastoral/Beatlesque).

I explained that while they are also dubbed "new wave," so were bands included here such as Talking Heads, Devo, Orange Juice, Wall of Voodoo, etc., who have a great musical commonality with the '70s XTC sound. Their use of synths on their first two albums, their experiments in dub (releasing an entire record of dub mixes), their wiry, angular guitar interplay on albums 3 and 4, esp. on tracks such as "Roads Girdle the Globe" and "Paper and Iron"---all clearly announce that this is a band with post-punk affiliation. Their influence on post-punk revival bands (Hot Hot Heat, Franz F., Futureheads) is clear.

Wesley said "They aren't called post-punk, though."

Well, the fact of the matter is that they often are, as can be seen by simply Googling "XTC" and "post-punk."

AMG: "After the punk revolution of 1977, a number of bands inspired by the d.i.y. spirit and raw sound of punk were formed. However, instead of replicating the sound of the Sex Pistols,many of these bands forged into more experimental territory, taking cues from a range of artists and styles, such as Roxy Music, David Bowie (especially Low, Heroes and Lodger), disco, dub and Krautrock. The result was Post-Punk, a more adventurous and arty form of punk, no less angry or political but often more musically complex and diverse. Many of these groups — like Joy Division or the Cure — created dark, synthesizer-oriented soundscapes while others— like Orange Juice or XTC — had a lighter guitar-based musical approach but their lyrics and music were off-kilter and often subverted traditional pop/rock song structures." http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=77:2636

"Classic examples of post-punk outfits include Public Image Ltd., Killing Joke, the Psychedelic Furs, Gang of Four, Joy Division, XTC, Echo and The Bunnymen, Josef K, The Raincoats, Talking Heads, Television, Wire, U2 and Magazine" http://wapedia.mobi/en/Post-Punk_Revival

And XTC's page on last.FM: "XTC were an influential post-punk/new wave band from Swindon, England." http://www.last.fm/music/XTC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 16:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The last two are unacceptable sources (particularly Last.fm, since anyone can add any tag they want to an artist and edit bios). Allmusic is fine, but does the band's Allmusic article label them post-punk? How about other reliable sources? WesleyDodds (talk) 12:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the larger issue here is whether a band has to be "proven" or exclusively labeled as post-punk in order to be included in what is clearly a loose and very, very diverse grouping of artists affiliated with this genre here. Post-punk is an extremely varied label that is not musically homogenous (like, say, bluegrass or black metal or roots reggae or something); in fact, that is one of the factors that distinguishes it from punk rock... The boundaries of what is and is not post-punk have always been fluid, and you are attempting to make them rigid. If XTC cannot be included, then a host of other acts mentioned here would be similarly excluded for not being exclusively and only labeled as post-punk; and frankly, when referring to the original post-punk bands of the '79-84 era, ALL of them were called other things as well at the time. Do you think that Gang of Four or the Banshees or Wire or Talking Heads were only called "post-punk" back in the day? They weren't. I remember, being a fan at the time. Those bands were variously called punk, new wave, alternative, gothic, etc.

I gave you good scholarly reasons why the music on those 1978-80 XTC albums is comparable to and sonically equivalent to other post-punk bands of the same era, and I cited examples (this is not a court of law, you know, and there's no magic book with a list of all True Post-Punk Bands) where XTC in that era is referred to and considered "post-punk." That should be enough. I don't have the time to write a thesis; that's why I suggested googling the terms. You'll see many references, which should tell you something right there; if the band had no post-punk affiliation, there wouldn't be any mentions. "Post-punk" is not a black and white rigidly defined genre, and it's delineated not by some "proof" (I note you have not spoken at all about the actual music), but by what people---ie, music fans and critics---call it. It's clear that the early XTC work is often mentioned as post-punk.

Here's some more stuff anyway:

Post-Punk.com's list (I think they are quite authoritative): http://www.movementproductions.net/ppbandslist-ac.html

Trouser Press (just as authoritative!): "XTC: Live in Concert, documenting a fierce 1980 show, stands in stark contrast. Goaded by Terry Chambers' workmanlike yet brutally crafty drum work, the band sprints with tight, adrenalized velocity through a tuneful set of post-punk classics including "Life Begins at the Hop," "Burning With Optimism's Flame" and "Making Plans for Nigel." http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=xtc

Crawdaddy: "Rock’s last great British post-punk eccentrics, XTC, (sorry, Blur), first assaulted American airwaves in 1979" http://crawdaddy.wolfgangsvault.com/Article/XTC-Explode-Together.html

WNEW.com: "The term post-punk goes back to the early eighties, when bands like the Psychedelic Furs, Joy Division, XTC, Echo and the Bunnymen and U2 started to branch out from punk and experiment with new sounds"

Guitar Player: "The Sex Pistols guitar sound was basically this blues guitar thing with a sneering attitude over the top," says Dave Gregory, former guitarist with post-punk pioneers XTC. "But people were oblivious to that. These punk bands were ridiculing people like Eric Clapton, when in fact the root of their sound was basic blues guitar."

NME: "Always one of the more interesting and innovative of the post-punk/pop crossover bands" http://www.nme.com/reviews/xtc/2361

  1. 17 on "Guide to Post-Punk Greats": http://rateyourmusic.com/list/IanSchultz/a_quick_guide_to_the_post_punk_greats_/

About.com: 80s Music: "British post-punk could not have had a better representative than XTC, a band that did more for '80s pop and rock than arguably any other artist of the era." http://80music.about.com/od/top10list1/tp/80stopxtcsongs.htm

MTV.com: "Andy Partridge, the reclusive leader of the post punk pop band, XTC"

George Graham: "one of the most interesting bands to come out of the late 1970s punk and post-punk scene in England was XTC." http://georgegraham.com/reviews/xtcav2.html

Tower.com: "Beginning life as a British post-punk pop band in the late '70s, XTC eventually metamorphosed into a kind of New Wave Beatles" http://www.tower.com/upsy-daisy-assortment-xtc-cd/wapi/105769101

I could cite dozens more...

And of course, they are included in definitive post-punk compilation CDS: Rough Trade Shops - Post-Punk: http://www.amazon.com/Rough-Trade-Shops-Post-Punk/dp/B00009QEON Post Punk Primer: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Post-Punk-Primer-Various-Artists/dp/B000024UQK Nervous Tension - The EMI Post Punk Collection: http://www.amazon.com/Nervous-Tension/dp/B000VXW4ZA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1226698766&sr=1-1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 21:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serious and experimental synhtpop artists?

[edit]

I thought Post-punk was associated with genres like early indie, proto gothic and gothic. Magazine and The Cure sounded similar, but OMD with them! There are many doubts.

I like New Wave, but i can't say that "serious", experimental and creative electronic artists of the late 70's and early eighties (who i also like), like Numan and his Tubeway Army, John Foxx, early OMD, early Human League or Cabaret Voltaire were post-punk. They were synthpop (or cold wave as sometimes they are called). Throbbing Gristle are synthpop/industrial. Depeche Mode never were post-punk, they were always synthpop, and "gothic" only for wearing black from 1984-89. Japan never was post-punk, they were only experimenting with glam, synthpop, avant-garde and pop, although "Automatic Gun" can be the "father" of britpop (which for me is a "nothing to do with" post-punk).

Please sign your post. This is basic Wikipedia rule and is simply respect for other discussants. N00w (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Franco, your own personal view of post-punk is not reflective of what the term was actually used to describe, either back in the classic '77-84 period, or now. It is a very large and flexible genre. You should read some articles and books on the subject to gain better insight into why many different musical styles (including electronic music) were included... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 15:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assertion that personal views should be avoided when editing Wikipedia pages, but here it's a difficult matter and what you do yourself is also expressing your own opinion. Post-punk is indeed a large and flexible genre that includes various subgenres like pre-gothic/batcave/coldwave/darkwave, early cyber punk and alternative rock, avantgarde rock, industrial, etc. New wave is a different genre, but the frontier is blurred and non-obvious. Plus, even the more or less "official" sources in this field tend to only express their authors' opinions too. Music remains a matter of taste and feeling before all, and in such cases like post-punk no single expert is considered an absolute reference enough, whom everyone could quote in order to say the exact truth about every band. The best source for understanding music is still listening to the most music you can and develop your own musical experience, which is different from the ones of others, then combine this with the more common public knowledge of historical influences and quotes of admittance by members of the so-called post-punk bands. According to this, I would tend to favor an all-inclusive approach while considering the following basic rules: (1) highly noticeable/known and obvious influence or derivation from punk music (but distinct from the punk genre), (2) non-membership to the new wave category in a publicly admitted and widely recognized manner, (3) main suggested post-punk works edited in the 1977–1984 period. N00w (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Depeche Mode

[edit]

Someone keeps questioning the inclusion of Depeche Mode here, and rather than just keep undoing the deletion, I am going to take the time to explain further. Call it synth-pop, call it experimental electronic, it's semantics. Whatever it is called, the early music of bands like Human League, OMD, Ultravox/John Foxx, Depeche Mode, Cab Volt, Soft Cell, Visage, Classix Nouveau, Fad Gadget, Yello, etc. has always been considered part of post-punk, which is a very elastic and non-homogenous genre. That's why all of those artists are listed here. To single out DM for deletion makes little musical or historical sense.

Read the post-punk bible "Rip It Up and Start Again" by Simon Reynolds and this will become evident, as they are a main part of Chapter 25. Rip It Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978-84 is a celebration of what happened next--bands like Joy Division, Gang of Four, Wire, Contortions, Talking Heads, The Fall, Cabaret Voltaire, The Human League--who dedicated themselves to fulfilling punk's unfinished musical revolution. Based on over 125 interviews, Rip It Up offers a panoramic survey of the seven year period following punk, taking in everything from PIL to ABC to SST to ZTT, and dealing with genres including industrial, 2-Tone, synthpop, and goth.

Reynolds article in eMusic.com: Post-punk spun off genres such as goth, industrial and synth-pop, and its long-term legacy can be seen in the '90s techno-rave/electronica movement, the current post-punk revivalist scene (Franz Ferdinand, the Rapture, Bloc Party, etc.), and, not least, the individual careers of some of the biggest alt-rock artists of the last 25 years — the Cure, Siouxsie & the Banshees, Depeche Mode, New Order and U2.

As for DM in particular, I will list further evidence.

Wikipedia's own entry: Depeche Mode Origin Basildon, Essex, England Genre(s) Synthpop Post-punk New Wave Alternative dance

DepecheMode.com: As one of the most influential bands of the post-punk era...

MusicianGuide.com: Depeche Mode, a group of post-punk pop performers who broke new ground in the field of computer-assisted music during the 1980s...

PrefixMag.com: Depeche Mode was a staple 80s post-punk/synth-pop band that is somehow still making music, when most of their contemporaries have kicked the bucket

SputnikMusic.com: Taking elements from post-punk and applying them to the post-Kraftwerk synth music of the 80s, Depeche Mode were the quintessential alternative act of the late 80s.

SlantMagazine.com: In the 1980s, the influence of Kraftwerk and New Wave took the shape of radio-friendly post-punk synth-pop like Depeche Mode

Amazon.com category for Depeche Mode: Rock > Indie Rock & Punk > New Wave & Post-punk

Allmusic.com Post-Punk section, #17 on list of Top Post-Punk Artists: The Cure Devo Echo & the Bunnymen The Fall Gang of Four Joy Division New Order Pere Ubu The Saints Siouxsie and the Banshees Suicide Talking Heads Wire Adam Ant Bauhaus Cabaret Voltaire Depeche Mode

The 20 Greatest Post-Punk Artists of the 1980s© Jason C. Reeher 9) Depeche Mode They made tinker-toy keyboard music until primary songwriter Martin L. Gore found his true muse – the darkness within. Recommended LPs: 1986’s devastatingly bleak “Black Celebration.” —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 16:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Before deleting the DM entry AGAIN, it would seem to be only polite to discuss the matter here first. DM after all were on this list before you chose to delete it. The burden of proof (to delete) is on you, and I see no concrete response to all I posted above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imho I would probably list Depeche Mode as a post-punk group but exclusively for the very period covering their early works e.g. their collaboration with Vince Clarke ("I Just Can't Get Enough"...) and following subsequent releases ("Master and Servants"...). On the other hand, I don't really agree with Human League still being on the list because it's just fruity new wave, and any influence of punk on their music is typically unclear. N00w (talk) 06:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, I don't really agree with Human League still being on the list because it's just fruity new wave

Have you listened to The Human League's first two albums? Sorry but that statement just looks kind of uninformed. Circa 1977-80 Human League was a very different, more experimental band than the one that later recorded "Human". More Kraftwerk than Frankie Goes to Hollywood, I'd dare say. Theburning25 (talk) 07:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.K. 14 verified as post-punk via reliable sources. Do not revert.

[edit]

Ling.Nut, please read the article. The list is for bands of the original post-punk movement, up to 1984. The list ENDS IN 1984. Modern post-punk bands (whether P.K. 14 is or not) are not listed here...there's lots of modern p-p bands, they are listed in the Post-Punk Revival section. If you want to list them there, go ahead, I don't care. But they don't belong as the only current/modern band in a list of bands from 1977-1984. Do you understand dating by years? You should read the article more carefully before being sarcastic with me. And yes, I've been a music journalist writing about post-punk for 25 years now.

They don't belong here. Post-punk refers to bands that played in a variety of styles influenced by punk between the late 1970s and mid-1980s. It isn't a style of music per se, and no band from the last 10 years is a "post-punk band".--Michig (talk) 11:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See those cited in the article. Simon Reynolds' book is highly recommended - you'd get a good idea of what post-punk was all about by reading it.--Michig (talk) 11:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article used to contain a separate section for the later post-punk influenced bands (see here) - this appears to have been deleted rather than moved to a separate list. Perhaps the content from there could be retrieved into a separate list and P.K.14 placed in that list? What is quite misleading these days when modern bands are referred to as "post-punk revival" or similar is that they are only influenced by a small part of the whole post-punk 'scene' - typically by bands such as Wire, Gang of Four, etc. or by bands better described as 'New Wave'. There was a lot more than that to post-punk. --Michig (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ling: I will say this as kindly as possible. You are jumping in here, on a genre you clearly are not too familiar with, and being very antagonistic. Having a pushy attitude does no one any favors. As Michig also noted, there did used to be expanded lists here, covering bands of the late '80s and '90s that were influenced by post-punk, and the modern post-punk (post-punk revival) bands, of which P.K.14 might be listed. Someone else removed them awhile ago as there is a separate post-punk revival list (you do understand that we are talking about dating here, right?). There is a reason the dates are given as 1977-1984, and Michig also provided the literary references to back this up. Anyway, it seems that the most parsimonious solution would be simply to add back the expanded lists, which hopefully then would satisfy your urge to have this band listed, without making a mockery of the section by singling out one modern band to be crammed into a list of bands from an older era. I will do that, let's see how it goes. Sorry I forgot to sign; the above message was by me. Greg Fasolino (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bunnydrums

[edit]

WarthogDemon asked why Bunnydrums are still on this list... They are on this list because they were a historically important (and fairly well-known) band in American post-punk, one of the first East Coast post-punk bands along with early '80s contemporaries like Mission of Burma and Bush Tetras. They were not some unknown band that released one 7-inch---they put out several albums, released both in the US and Europe, they toured, were written up in all of the prominent publications of the day including CMJ, Village Voice, Sounds, Billboard, Trouser Press, NY Rocker, etc. Their music (which is textbook post-punk in the vein of Killing Joke, Go4, PiL etc.) has continued to be recognized and reissued. To remove them arbitrarily when they were more relevant to this list than dozens of much smaller and more obscure acts that remain on the list, is absurd. Here are some sources: http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=bunnydrums http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:gvftxqrgldse http://music.barnesandnoble.com/PKD-Simulacra/Bunnydrums/e/782388029223 http://relivethe80s.com/articles/bunnydrums.htm http://www.discogs.com/artist/Bunnydrums http://www.answers.com/topic/bunnydrums

Please let's do some research before deleting something of importance. Greg Fasolino (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for Malaria! and Minny Pops. These were two of the more well known and influential continental European post-punk bands. Minny Pops were on Factory Records for heaven's sake! (and produced by Martin Hannett, not to mention being the first band from the Netherlands to record a Peel Session). Anyone remotely interested in post-punk as a genre knows who Malaria! is, they are a seminal German post-punk band along with Neubauten and Xmal. It's totally ridiculous to have to defend their place here. Neither of these acts were hyper-obscure bands that were never played on college radio or written up in the UK music papers. To remove them, and keep these tiny bands is unjustifiable. http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=malaria
http://commercialzone.blogspot.com/2009/07/malaria-compiled-1981-1984.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=379KlQZ3fBM
http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=minny_pops
http://home.planet.nl/~frankbri/minnyhis.html
http://www.cerysmaticfactory.info/minny_pops.html Greg Fasolino (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube isn't an appropriate source. However, I am not sure about some of the others, and Bunnydrums being listed in allmusic does give something to go on. Since this is the first time I've seen some of these sites, so I'll have to check. -WarthogDemon 03:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube clip was included simply to provide additional illustration as to the popularity of the song in question, back in the early '80s. AllMusic is a reliable modern source; though Trouser Press is equally if not more so, since it was published in the 1970s and early 1980s and was one of the main forums in the United States for post-punk reviews/articles when the genre was actually being created. For many music fans in the pre-internet eras, the "Trouser Press Record Guide" books were a primary source for learning about this music. Greg Fasolino (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on! You talk about American post-punk bands, but what do you think of Suicide and Controlled Bleeding not being on the list? Now they are in. Suicide were amongst the most important "fathers" of post-punk. The duo formed in 1971 but their first album was recorded and released in 1977. Other major bands I've added are Alien Sex Fiend from the UK, Front 242 and The Neon Judgement from Belgium, and Skinny Puppy from Canada. In the list of Post-punk-influenced bands (1984–mid 1990s), I've added Front Line Assembly, Nine Inch Nails and The Smashing Pumpkins. TSP is really obvious while for NIN, you could just check their covers of other post-punk groups, such as Joy Division. N00w (talk) 05:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


"Post-punk influenced bands"

[edit]

Shouldn't this just be deleted? I mean, I think that after the Post-Punk explosion, most "Alternative Rock"/Grunge/Shoegaze/Noise Pop/Britpop etc etc etc bands have taken some sort of inspiration from the movement... --186.87.18.252 (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Post-punk revivalists should be deleted quite frankly, but that's not going to happen. Theburning25 (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The links to and influences from the P-P explosion on the "Post-punk influenced bands" listed were more direct and more of an uninterrupted lineage than most. This section illustrates that the genre did not suddenly become extinct in 1984.

As for Theburning25's comment, what do you mean? The revival section has its own separate Wikipedia entry and there is only links to it here, so what is the issue? Why would you want to delete reference to the fact that this music genre is still ongoing? Greg Fasolino (talk) 13:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ending it in 1984 and putting 1985-2000 acts in an influence section just because Simon Reynolds ended his book in 1984 is wrong. Great book and the "bible" if you will, but if you read the last chapter he ended it in 1984 because HE became disinterested due to the trend towered roots rock and 1960's influences that occurred in 1985. He never said it ended in 1984 and indeed many reliable sources described acts as post punk throughout the late 1980's and 1990's. The bigger problem with the definitions of late 1980's acts was put succinctly by Jon Pareles in 1987 when he wrote "Alternative, independent, post-punk, new wave - whatever it's called at the moment". Edkollin (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Greg: At the time I wrote that, I had assumed the revival acts were listed on the same page, but I see now that they're linked to a separate one. Which is something I have far less of a problem with. But for the record, my original complaint was more a voicing of a personal bias than a serious suggestion for a change (hence "that's not going to happen"). Theburning25 (talk) 08:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post-punk individual artists

[edit]

The whole list seems to serve the same purpose as the category ||Category:Post-punk music groups|| I don't know why, but both pages only tend to focus on groups/bands but not individual artists. This said, there are names listed in here such as Laurie Anderson, Monte Cazzaza, John Foxx, Klaus Nomi, etc. but they are not namely "bands". Considering this, I've hesitated to add other major artists who both have influenced and have been influenced by post-punk during the same period. These of course include David Bowie, Iggy Pop, Lou Reed and Billy Idol but also, to some extent, Grace Jones, Brian Eno, Ryuichi Sakamoto, Hajime Tachibana ... So, what should be done now? I'd personally recommend to change the title of this page into "List of post-punk artists" or "List of post-punk artists and bands". If not, I don't really see the purpose of this page existing at all, due to the "Post-punk music groups" category already filling the need for a full list of post-punk bands. N00w (talk) 05:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this case most readers are not taking the word "bands" literally, but using it in the casual sense to refer to "music artists." So why not go ahead and change the title to "List of post-punk artists." I would disagree strongly though, that this list is equivalent to the "Post-punk music groups" category. The latter is random in terms of what is included, and lacks context or historical knowledge; this list is exponentially more informative and authoritative. I'd see no reason also not to add Grace Jones or Ryuichi---i thought he was in there but perhaps it was just YMO. I don't think Billy Idol really fits on this list at all; his Gen X work is clearly punk rock mixed with a bit of hard rock, not post-punk (save for some material on their last album), and his solo work would be more accurately classified as new wave and hard rock. The older artists you mention don't belong on the list itself because they are influences, way predating the post-punk era, rather than being post-punk artists themselves. The actual main post-punk article does not touch on specific artists that influenced the genre, so maybe you want to add some text there, listing the likes of Bowie, Pop, Eno, Reed, etc. as influences.Greg Fasolino (talk) 14:52, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed

[edit]

We need some sources here. A lot of the entries in the list are rubbish, e.g. The Police and The Jam as post-punk bands. Perhaps it's time to insist that only sourced entries are included.--Michig (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how well lists like this can be sourced. They kind of exist by consensus via a steady pruning of egregious outliers. Classifications are not as verifiable as facts. Who's opinion is authoritative? Can you give an example of another list that has managed it successfully? Wwwhatsup (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List of black metal bands, 0–K.--Michig (talk) 08:27, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black metal is a far more stylistically singular and often homogeneous sound. It's relatively easy to pinpoint it and there are certain specific qualifiers or checklists one could use to discern whether something was more black metal, more thrash metal, or more doom metal, for example. Post-punk by its very nature and definition (i.e., as a diversification and stylistic expansion--in many directions--of punk rock) does not have an easily defined sound. The post-punk umbrella is fairly expansive, so it's only natural that there will extensive debate about who or what is included in it. To look at your examples, I don't think the Police really fit, but someone else may have a different argument. The earlier works by The Jam likewise, to me, are clearly punk rock, but they absorbed some post-punk influences later on and certainly 1980's "Sound Affects" album has an extensive post-punk flavor ("Pretty Green" and others are in the same vein as Gang of Four/XTC). Several Jam singles from that period are also post-punk, most obviously 1981's "Funeral Pyre." I wouldn't call The Jam a post-punk band, but it's not "rubbish" to suggest a strong connection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Fasolino (talk • contribs) 16:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of the most ridiculous lists I've seen

[edit]

More than half of the listed bands should be delete at they were not, and are not post-punk. The term as it was used in the 80's was very specific, and with a very specif sound. Most people dont seem to understand this. It was very (mainly) British oriented. While technically they are post -punk, ie they have a punky, confrontational sound and they appear after the punk explosion, it does not make them post punk.

AND FOR THE RECORD....NO, the B52's and Depeche Mode ARE NOT POST PUNK.Starbwoy (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was around in the 1980s, playing and writing about post-punk, and it never had a "very specific sound." The entire idea of post-punk was that it was not specific---it was a reaction to the way punk rock had become somewhat simplistic, uniform, and monochromatic. It was meant to be more diverse and creative than punk. Even the original founders of post-punk all sounded very different from each other. Wire sound nothing like Siouxsie and the Banshees. Public Image Ltd. do not sound like The Cure. Gang of Four do not sound like Echo and the Bunnymen. Joy Division do not sound like Cabaret Voltaire or The Birthday Party or Virgin Prunes or Magazine. Etc. etc etc.Greg Fasolino (talk) 03:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Salvation Army is not a post-punk group. Actually, it is not a rock band

[edit]

Hello you all! So I just want to note that the link to the Californian group The Salvation Army, is directed towards the Christian organization. I changed the direction to "The Salvation Army (band)" and it was reversed. If you want to keep that link in this (polemic) list, I guess it should be explain why. Thank you in advance for your support!--Castelao (talk) 17:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of post-punk bands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly you missed ATV on the list. That is Perry's band, it's a definite post punk band which moved into a very avantgarde direction. They made song about the desillusion with punk itself. They had typical post punk guitar work, even on their first album, released before Magazines first album. A good example of how they weren't punk anymore is the song "Nasty Little Lonely".62.44.135.112 (talk) 08:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of post-punk bands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RockFeedBack and sourcing.

[edit]

A number of months ago, a band-name added by myself to the list was removed, on the basis that the publication I used to verify my changes, RockFeedBack.com, was "not a reliable source". This is not correct. Nowhere on the site has this official rock music magazine been deemed an "unreliable source", and appears copious times as a source for information on Wikipedia. Unless an objection is raised, my additions made in May 2019 will be re-implemented in a short time. --JoeyofScotia (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_post-punk_bands&oldid=1256995801"