Talk:List of phylogenetic tree visualization software

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of phylogenetic tree visualization software article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Other packages to add

HyperTree,
CTree,
TreeIllustrator
MixtureTree Annotator

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of phylogenetic tree visualization software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721023225/http://www.ncbi.orthomam.univ-montp2.fr/phyloexplorer/ to http://www.ncbi.orthomam.univ-montp2.fr/phyloexplorer/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.phyloviewer.org/intro.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090819083843/http://bioinfo.unice.fr/biodiv/Tree_editors.html to http://bioinfo.unice.fr/biodiv/Tree_editors.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other roundups of tree viewers and related software

Should compare this article to these lists to see if we've exhausted them:

AABoyles (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reformat table of online software?

Of the three tables on this page the first one, online software, seems the least well formatted. My suggestion is that we reformat it to match the other two tables with Name, Description, Citation as the columns. Only 1 entry has added license info so that doesn't seem very popular or useful. I suggest we drop that column. Any thoughts? XCalPab (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]