Talk:List of people associated with University College London

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Subjects

Wouldn't it be interesting to include the subjects studied by each alumnus where known? Lfh 09:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Derbyshire

Added John Derbyshire. Cite: see http://www.nationalreview.com/derbyshire/derbyshire112801.shtml

Style note: Derbyshire is a conservative but not a Conservative. -- Writtenonsand 14:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lists verse categories

why does this human-edited list exist? is it not better to file individual pages into the correct categories and have them show under the auto lists? Artlondon 11:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable business figures

I have reduced the list here as there were loads of people on the list who , yes, held senior business positions, but who could hardly be considered "notable". Not only did none of them have their on Wikipedia page but in most cases neither did the company that they held a senior position in.

There is method to my deletions; only people for whom their company (the senior position in which was the rationale for their inclusion) had its own article on Wikipedia remained. The rest are clearly not notable. Otherwise we may as well add thousands of people to this article.--Zoso Jade (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re-jig business figures

Yes, that looks much more useful (and honest) Ucypanp (talk) 22:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

current staff of note

Are really the only current staff of note in the "Mathematical, Physical and Space Sciences" and "Medical and Biological Sciences" departments? The limited or partisan nature of the page makes the university look quite poor. Maybe there aren't many staff of note, however. --Septemberfourth476 (talk) 00:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad this strikes you as odd. Me too! But, you see, when I was trying to make the pre-existing, somewhat disorderly page look more orderly, with subject disciplines, I did not feel confident simply to delete those 'names' who were not 'previous' or 'past', and which had been put up on the page by others.
BTW the 'Current' staff subjects are here simply because these were the subject disciplines of the pre-existing 'Current' folks I found already on the page.
For myself I would prefer not to list 'Current' staff at all, because the list here could get entirely out of hand, and, of course, UCL has a perfectly good website where 'Current' staff can be found in their proper academic context (in a way that past staff cannot).
What say this 'Current' section just gets deleted?
Ucypanp (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Abdulmutallab

"UCL reports that whilst there is no student on their records with this precise name, they have found someone with a similar name and a university spokesperson has said 'It must be stressed that the university has no evidence that this is the same person currently being referred to in the media.'" In other words, they have a name close to it, but do not believe it is the same individual. It's media speculation that is unencylopedic and inappropriate here, atleast until it can be nailed down for certain. I am aware of Epeefleche's stance here and elsewhere on this issue, so I would appreciate third-party opinions. Grsz¹¹ 18:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see the ref support for the other info, but is there a ref for the quoted language above? It is a bit at odds with the ref'd language that the school found someone with that name.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a quote of your addition to the article. Grsz¹¹ 20:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst? Don't think so.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I assume this is a non-issue for you at this point ... correct?--Epeefleche (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yes, they're your words. Grsz¹¹ 04:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. You're wrong. Keep scrolling back on that diff. Secondly, as I said before, I assume this is a non-issue for you at this point--am I correct on that as well?--Epeefleche (talk) 04:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With the new confirmations it's fine, and that's all we expect here. We don't report speculation, merely historical fact, now we have stronger sourcing for it. The header isn't ideal, but I've no clue what else to title it. Cheers, 04:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of people associated with University College London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914105055/http://www.shl.lon.ac.uk/specialcollections/archives/studentrecords.shtml to http://www.senatehouselibrary.ac.uk/our-collections/historic-collections/archives-manuscripts/university-of-london-student-records-1836-1931/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of people associated with University College London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]