Talk:List of object database management systems

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Databases (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is within the field of Systems.

This list is incomplete, as stated on the page itself. It is however als inconsistent. Wikipedia makes a (correct!) distinction, between object databases, object relational databases and relational databases. This list is advertised as object database management systems but contains members of all three groups. The first entry in the list is Cache, which is an object-relational database, not an object-database. Similarly, Oracle is listed, but has always been a relational database that has some object-relational capabilities. Is anyone keeping an eye on this? Angeloh (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking? I really wanted to see a list of truly OODBMS, but see products like Oracle, Postgres, etc. They call themselves as post relational or object-relational DBMS (because it was in). But for sure, they are not native OO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.146.47.150 (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt abt oracle under list of odbms

racle was famously known as for its RDBMS, but it was mentioned under list of odbms. Can anyone give answer for this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gladsonorama (talk • contribs) 14:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Object-relational database Tedickey (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of nonnotable software

Most of the redlinks are for programs that aren't notable, and should be removed Tedickey (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]