Talk:List of number-one singles in 2008 (New Zealand)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of number-one singles in 2008 (New Zealand) was copied or moved into List of number-one singles from the 2000s (New Zealand) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Album Photos
[edit]Are the album Photos necessary because i find they take up to much space and are just really annoying anyway please comment on why/why not this should be kept/not kept. Glamgirljaspreet101 (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Table format
[edit]Which table format would the article be better of with?. The one currently being used in the article, or the table which User:Laydan Mortensen has created to be used in the article? JayJ47 (talk) 05:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Important Note: Most of the other lists of the number-ones for New Zealand are listed in this format. This format is also much easier to read. JayJ47 (talk) 05:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have reverted the recent edits made to the table format because a concencus has not yet been reached. I am asking for other editors to come here and discuss which table format would be more appropiate. SJPH (talk) 06:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe the newer version is easier to read now I have made some changes. The only change I am planning to make is to merge together multiple cells, and emphasise New Zealand Songs in the charts. At the moment it looks messy with consecutive cells containing the same data.
If we agree, the first few rows of the table will look like this:-
Week | Artist | Title | Album |
---|---|---|---|
6 January | Leona Lewis | "Bleeding Love" | Spirit |
14 January | |||
21 January | |||
28 January | Flo Rida featuring T-Pain |
"Low" | Mail on Sunday |
4 February | |||
11 February | |||
18 February | Chris Brown | "With You" | Exclusive |
Leave any messages for me on my talk page please.
Thanks, Laydan Mortensen (talk) 07:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Or how about we use this format instead as shown below:
Week | Artist | Title | Album | |
January 6 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 14 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 21 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
and so on. What do you guys think????? JayJ47 (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's fine with me - maybe not so wide, and with a contrasting title bar. I would also like to be able to differentiate between international songs and New Zealand songs, maybe by highlighting the New Zealand songs (not that here are any at the moment).
- How about this :-
Week beginning Artist Title Album January 6 Leona Lewis Bleeding Love Spirit January 14 Leona Lewis Bleeding Love Spirit January 21 Leona Lewis Bleeding Love Spirit 28 January Flo Rida featuring T-Pain Low Mail on Sunday
Laydan Mortensen (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm...... I think the album is a bit too close to the song. However I do agree with you, on the table i suggested. The columns are too far apart but i'm not sure how to fix this. How about you try and fix it? JayJ47 (talk) 06:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- JayJ47, I know what the problem was. All you have to do was reduce the width down from 100% to a percentage like 60%. Laydan Mortensen (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
So what do you guys think we should do?. I think its best that we choose one of the tables you guys have suggested. Both look fine to me, but i'd like us all to come to the same conclusion. SJPH (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think i'll leave it up to you, Laydan. I'll be happy with whatever you choose. What do you think SJPH? JayJ47 (talk) 06:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going with the latest table - at least it is cleaner than the one we had. I'll convert it over now. Laydan Mortensen (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- The new table looks great. Good job. JayJ47 (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply guys!! I've been busy with school work. Yea up to you laydan. Good job with the new table!! SJPH (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- The new table looks great. Good job. JayJ47 (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going with the latest table - at least it is cleaner than the one we had. I'll convert it over now. Laydan Mortensen (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)